In article ,
ryniek90 wrote:
But I remember that lambda function also was unwelcome in Python, but
finally it is and is doing well. So maybe someone, someday decide to
put in Python an alternative, really great implementation of scanf() ?
How long have you been using Python? lambd
In article ,
ryniek90 wrote:
>
>But I remember that lambda function also was unwelcome in Python, but
>finally it is and is doing well. So maybe someone, someday decide to
>put in Python an alternative, really great implementation of scanf() ?
How long have you been using Python? lambda has bee
On Oct 3, 8:17 pm, Grant Edwards wrote:
(--snip--)
> One of the fist things I remember being taught as a C progrmmer
> was to never use scanf. Programs that use scanf tend to fail
> in rather spectacular ways when presented with simple typos and
> other forms of unexpected input.
>
> Given the
On Oct 9, 5:59 pm, Joshua Kugler wrote:
> ryniek90 wrote:
> > So maybe someone, someday decide to
> > put in Python an alternative, really great implementation ofscanf() ?
>
> My idea of a "greatscanf() function" would be a clever combination of
> re.match(), int(), and float().
>
> j
Actually, t
ryniek90 wrote:
> So maybe someone, someday decide to
> put in Python an alternative, really great implementation of scanf() ?
My idea of a "great scanf() function" would be a clever combination of
re.match(), int(), and float().
j
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ryniek90 wrote:
On 6 Paź, 06:37, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:48:16 -0700 (PDT), TerryP
declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
In the last 4 years, I have never missed functions like .*scanf() or
atoi().
It's probably a greeaaat thing that Python provides net
2009/10/8 ryniek90 :
> Ok thanks all for answers. Not counting .split() methods and regexps,
> there's nothing interesting.
> But I remember that lambda function also was unwelcome in Python, but
> finally it is and is doing well. So maybe someone, someday decide to
> put in Python an alternative,
On Oct 3, 11:06 pm, ryniek90 wrote:
> Hi
>
> I know that in python, we can do the same with regexps or *.split()*,
> but thats longer and less practical method than *scanf()*. I also found
> that (http://code.activestate.com/recipes/502213/), but the code
> doesn't looks so simple for beginners. S
On 6 Paź, 06:37, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:48:16 -0700 (PDT), TerryP
> declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
>
> > In the last 4 years, I have never missed functions like .*scanf() or
> > atoi().
>
> > It's probably a greeaaat thing that Python provides neth
In the last 4 years, I have never missed functions like .*scanf() or
atoi().
It's probably a greeaaat thing that Python provides nether as built
ins (per se).
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:18:22 -0400,
Simon Forman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Martien Verbruggen
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 01:17:18 + (UTC),
>> Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> On 2009-10-03, ryniek90 wrote:
>>>
So, whether it is or has been planned the core Pytho
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Martien Verbruggen
wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 01:17:18 + (UTC),
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2009-10-03, ryniek90 wrote:
>>
>>> So, whether it is or has been planned the core Python
>>> implementation of *scanf()* ?
>>
>> One of the fist things I remem
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 01:17:18 + (UTC),
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-10-03, ryniek90 wrote:
>
>> So, whether it is or has been planned the core Python
>> implementation of *scanf()* ?
>
> One of the fist things I remember being taught as a C progrmmer
> was to never use scanf. Program
On 2009-10-03, ryniek90 wrote:
> So, whether it is or has been planned the core Python
> implementation of *scanf()* ?
One of the fist things I remember being taught as a C progrmmer
was to never use scanf. Programs that use scanf tend to fail
in rather spectacular ways when presented with simp
ryniek90 wrote:
Hi
I know that in python, we can do the same with regexps or *.split()*,
but thats longer and less practical method than *scanf()*. I also found
that ( http://code.activestate.com/recipes/502213/ ), but the code
doesn't looks so simple for beginners. So, whether it is or has b
Hi
I know that in python, we can do the same with regexps or *.split()*,
but thats longer and less practical method than *scanf()*. I also found
that ( http://code.activestate.com/recipes/502213/ ), but the code
doesn't looks so simple for beginners. So, whether it is or has been
planned the
16 matches
Mail list logo
