Bryan Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roy Smith wrote:
Does no one care about an internal error in the regular expression
engine?
Yes, but - given the example - In about the same way that I care about an
internal error in my car engine after dropping a
this should really be posted to http://www.thedailywtf.com/, I wonder
if they have a german version of TheDailyWTF.com?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Roy Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I know this is not the intended
use for regular expressions, but it should
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bryan Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roy Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I
Bryan Olson wrote:
Roy Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I know this is not the intended
use for regular
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does no one care about an internal error in the regular expression
engine?
Not one that requires parsing a 100 kilobyte re that should be
replaced by something more sensible, no.
If the internal error means the re engine bumped into some internal
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Paul Rubin http://[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Holden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does no one care about an internal error in the regular expression
engine?
Not one that requires parsing a 100 kilobyte re that should be
replaced by something more
[Bryan Olson]
Does no one care about an internal error in the regular expression
engine?
[Steve Holden]
Not one that requires parsing a 100 kilobyte re that should be replaced
by something more sensible, no.
I care: this is a case of not detecting information loss due to
unchecked
Tim Peters wrote:
[Bryan Olson]
Does no one care about an internal error in the regular expression
engine?
[Steve Holden]
Not one that requires parsing a 100 kilobyte re that should be replaced
by something more sensible, no.
I care: this is a case of not detecting information loss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev i en meddelelse
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I know this is not the intended
use for regular
Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote:
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I know this is not the intended
use for regular expressions, but it should nonetheless
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I know this is not the intended
use for regular expressions, but it should nonetheless work.
the pattern is
ur'(N-|NO-)?(5259
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I know this is not the intended
use for regular expressions, but it should nonetheless work.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I know this is not the intended
use for regular expressions, but it should nonetheless work.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a regular expression that is approximately 100k bytes. (It is
basically a list of all known norwegian postal numbers and the
corresponding place with | in between. I know this is not the intended
use for regular expressions, but
15 matches
Mail list logo