fuzzyman> You could also try akismet which is designed for finding spam
fuzzyman> 'comments' in blogs, a similar problem area.
Thanks. It appears that Akismet is a non-free tool, so doesn't fit in real
well with the open source nature of MoinMoin and SpamBayes. I think I'll
leave it to
T> I think it's a fantastic idea, myself. I think it should work well.
T> It's probably important to filter the edit, not the whole article,
T> otherwise the ham might obscure the spam.
That would be a good second phase. My experience with most wiki spam so far
is that the spammers r
I think it's a fantastic idea, myself. I think it should work well.
It's probably important to filter the edit, not the whole article,
otherwise the ham might obscure the spam.
Cheers,
-T
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 9, 12:31 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have this idea that I should be able to write a security policy for
> MoinMoin which uses SpamBayes to judge the appropriateness of any given
> submission. It would be more accurate and faster than the current default
> security policy in MoinMoin.
I have this idea that I should be able to write a security policy for
MoinMoin which uses SpamBayes to judge the appropriateness of any given
submission. It would be more accurate and faster than the current default
security policy in MoinMoin. I started to work on it and have something
that see
