Four Years of. "MI5 Persecution" Posts on Internet Newsgroups For approximately the first three. years of the MI5 persecution, from June 1990 until late 1992, I kept as quiet as possible, in. the hope that by not reacting, MI5s interest in me would. decrease and they would simply go away of their own accord. This is the sort of behaviour some. people employ against bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then. they might simply. go away and victimize someone else.
Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work. The quieter I. became, the more shrill and hysterical the noise. from the Security Service operatives. For about two years I didnt watch TV. news at all. Yet this only heightened their obsessed fixation; they continued to. follow me wherever I went, they continued to induce harassment at work. by managers and fellow workers, and they continued to encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to. regard my refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put right" by. ever more. extreme forms of abuse. Finally, in 1995, I changed tactics. radically. Since late 1994 I had had accounts with. internet providers in Ontario, Canada. I discovered the cornucopia of internet newsgroups,. on every topic from consumer electronics, to politics and legal topics, and I discovered. online services such as Compuserve and. AOL. In May 1995, I made the first posting to the conspiracy newsgroup, on. the subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame". BBC's Hidden. Shame The internet newsgroup discussion, which has now reached. its fourth anniversary, started with an article in alt.conspiracy,. which I reproduce here. Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject:. BBC's Hidden Shame Remember the. two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you back? Which you could never get rid of, only the sound could be. turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his. nightmare follow into the world after him.. Since 1990 the British have been waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse in. the transmitted media in. their efforts to humiliate their "victim". And the most remarkable thing about it is that what. they do is not even illegal - the UK has no laws to protect the privacy of its citizens, nor does. it proscribe harassment or abuse. except in the case of racial abuse. A lot of people in England know this to be going on, yet so far they have. maintained perfect "omerta"; not a sound, not a squeak has. escaped into the English press, and for all the covert harassment absolutely. nothing has come out into the public domain. Have the British gone mad? I think we. should be told At this point, I did not name. MI5 as my persecutors. I was still unsure that they were the ones responsible for the. "psychological terrorism". In followup posts however I did name them; and the persecutors have. never denied the claim; so I think my guess is valid.. (The Security Service Tribunal in 1997 have said "no determination in your favour was. made", but it is a well. established fact that MI5 lies routinely to the Tribunal which has never found in favour of a plaintiff, so no conclusions. can be drawn from. this.) This first post was made to alt.conspiracy, but further posts were. made to the. UK-local newsgroups, in particular uk.misc but also uk.legal and uk.politics (which is now called. uk.politics.misc). Some time ago I tried to take the battle to. the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now called UKCURRENT -. current affairs), but my articles were censored by the forum operators. Such censorship is impossible on the internet. newsgroups. Police Refuse to. Act I have complained several times to the Metropolitan. Police, who have each time. refused to help. From: Green. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution:. Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To:. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun Apr . 7 21:13:30 1996 In. article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> . [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Mike Corley" writes: >Last Easter (1995) I went. into the local police station in London and spoke to >an officer about the harassment against me. But I. couldn't provide tangible >evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago,. is beyond proof, and >without something to support my statements I cannot expect a. police officer to >take. the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the. police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them. by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence,. they often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go. to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that. if they looked into this, they would be leant on. hard. The met always stays away from anything that. looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise. that they are below these government agencies in the general pecking. order. If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping. on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence,. because that bored desk seargant with only five. years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has. incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his. cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have. some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him. a bollocking. In short, you have earned much. sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy. of your enemies. Most. recently, I wrote in March 1999 to Charing Cross Police Station CID. They did not acknowledge or reply to my letter. When. I phoned them up, the detective Id written to treated me to. a sadly not unusual display of police bigotry,. with an uneducated rant about "your paranoid rubbish". It would be. nice to think that such uneducated bigotry is something other than wholly typical of police behaviour, but. unfortunately that is an illusion that is rapidly. dispelled. Uncorruptible Jon Snow. of Channel Four News >From previous articles the reader will. know what I think Jon Snow has recently been watching me while. he reads Channel Four News in the evening. Recently. I digitized a few moments of one such broadcast, where his face twists into a. smile, without there being anything in the news broadcast to. cause merriment. Here is a usenet post from some time ago on MI5s "bought and paid for" tools in the so-called. "free" press. Peter. Harding ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : I was at speakers' corner on Sunday. There. was one chap who was bellowing : about something or other, I don't know what, but. one thing he said to : someone caught. my ear: : "BBC, MI5, same. thing." Can't. disagree with that sentiment. Wasn't it. documented that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters? I remember reading a report by some jouralist who had been offered an. extra tax-free. income by MI5 to become their covert mouthpiece, and had refused. ............................................................................. > : >mouthpiece,. and had refused. >. : > : It. was Jon Snow of Channel 4. > > Was it reported. in any of the papers? It has been reported several times. The most recent. was in Private Eye, a few. months back. As I recall they also wanted information from him; journalists would be a natural choice for members. of the Security Service and the Secret Intelligence Service for information. sources. >. It might be interesting to see what he had to say regarding their > attempt. to recruit him. He. was most concerned that many others would have accepted such an offer. However, we can. probably make an educated guess as to some of those who accepted:. Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and Chapman Pincher would come. near to the top of the list. -- \/ David. Boothroyd. Socialist and election analyst. Omne ignotum pro magnifico. British Elections and Politics. at http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html I wish I was in North Dakota. Next General. Election must be before 22nd May '97 The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab 272,. L Dem 25, UU 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4, UDUP. 3, Ind 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1. Telephone Tate 6125. Corrupt Security Service agents steal millions. from taxpayers Money is of course a factor in the grand equation which is. the MI5 persecution. It costs money for the. Security Service to "buy" people in the media etc. But. that is only a small part of their expenditure of taxpayers resources. Most of the expenditure. is directly on the salaries if the agents involved; and in this. post I put forward the theory that MI5 are trying to draw out their. involvement for as long as possible, very cynically, to. maximise their income and line their own pockets. At each stage they have tried to pretend that I am something. out of the ordinary. Either I was very stupid ("he's an idiot") or very clever. ("he's like a genius"). Either I was a threat. to Western civilization (Levin once referred to me as the next Hitler) or I was completely defenceless ("a. soft toy"). Now, it should be obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not out of. the ordinary in any way.. I have an IQ which is average for the Web, I am racially white European, and there are plenty of other people. with schizophrenia or epilepsy out there who haven't been. targeted for MI5 attention, so why me? I think the answer is that the MI5. agents who harass me have cynically exploited the situation by painting me as. extraordinary in order to assure themselves of well-paid employment funded by the ordinary British taxpayer. To put it. bluntly, they are stealing millions of pounds from the taxpayer to feed their own. pockets. This assertion is supported by the. observation that it's the same agents who are doing the harassment. Six. months ago in a local hospital I was harassed by someone whose face I had seen (he had stared straight at me aggressively, at the time I. just thought it was some nutter but it turns out he was one of "them") aboard a KLM. flight a couple of years ago. It's presumably. been the same people most of the time. I've seen the way contractors act when they don't want their positions terminated. Would. these agents really want to. lose their well-paid employment harassing me? Presumably they are promising their bosses a "breakthrough" (ie my demise) real-soon-now and have. been for the last seven years,. while all the while these MI5 agents skim millions off. the taxpayer. I wouldn't mind a job like that. Perhaps if I. persecute myself a little bit, like standing in front. of a mirror and shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I'd get a slice. of the caky Service Tribunal. This year Nick Brooks, current Tribunal. Secretary, confirmed to me that he could not think of a single case where the Tribunal had found in favour of. a complainant. Here is my usenet post. from two years ago. Subject: MI5: "It wasn't. us" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal Organization: Toronto. Free-Net "The Security Service. Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and have asked me to inform. you that no determination in your favour has been made on your. complaint." Signed ER. Wilson, Tribunal Secretary Well that's a relief then.. All that spamming for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if they say they're not doing it then it can't be them, can. it? In. a recent letter to Mr Brooks I expressed the opinion that the Tribunal were unable to fulfil their responsibilities in the. face of MI5 falsehoods. Nevertheless, I do intend to make. another complaint to the Tribunal. in the near future, despite the Tribunal appearing to be a toothless. watchdog. Discrimination against. a Unit Minority MI5 have been very clear in their instructions as to what. I should do. They have openly shouted at me the word "suicide",. and also from the other abuse it is clear. that they want my existence terminated. This point. is covered in more detail in a previous article. The following post describes the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against. me. They have refined their bigotry down to a unit minority, yet they. make use of the discrimination against the. mentally ill which is a feature of current British. society. Subject: Re: MI5 says "Kill. Yourself" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media References:. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Toronto. Free-Net Distribution: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Iain L M. Hotchkies) wrote: >Indeed. If you've ever had a. 'conversation' with someone suffering >from florid schizophrenia,. you'll know how difficult it can be to >'argue' with. them. I don't have florid symptoms. But I'm in a difficult situation,. because those people who. don't know, aren't going to believe, and those who do, they just go along. with the crowd. It's never a good idea to go against the grain, and the grain here. is defined by interests in the establishment and the media. Even people who could say. out loud what was happening won't, because then there's a risk that they'll be. seen as traitors and ostracised. Usually. this type of 'hidden abuse' is racial and targetted at a racial minority within a country. You keep the minorities out of. the good jobs, but you. don't admit discrimination exists. It happens everywhere, not just in Britain. The persecution that. is going on now is in reality a refined form of racism. Instead of. "nigger" it's "nutter", and abusing the mentally ill is still socially acceptable today. In 50 years it might not. be, but today there isn't. any social or legal sanction against it. So really they've refined racial harassment down to a minority of one.. The words. may be different, but the methods are the same. 3406 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
