Op 14-01-13 13:38, Peter Otten schreef:
> It turns out the logic of the above is correct. The problem is that the
> handler has to see the INFO-level records while the filter() method has to
> reject them. The following configuration seems to achieve that:
I see, I thought trowing away logrecord
Antoon Pardon wrote:
> I have some in house code for which I am considering replacing the
> logging code with something that uses the logging module.
> However there is one thing the in-house log code does, that seems
> difficult to do with the logging module, provide some context. The
> in-hous
I have some in house code for which I am considering replacing the
logging code
with something that uses the logging module.
The code is typically used as a cron job with everything higher than
info logged to
a file and everything higher than warning logged to stderr.
However there is one thing
