On Apr 12, 2:02 pm, sturlamolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 12, 7:05 pm, sturlamolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In theory, a GIL private to each (sub)interpreter would make Python
more scalable. The current GIL behaves like the BKL in earlier Linux
kernels. However, some third-party
Diez B. Roggisch schrieb:
AFAIK there was a thread a few month ago that stated that this is
actually possible - but mostly 3rd-party-c-extension aren't capable of
supporting that. Martin von Loewis had a word in that, maybe googling
with that in mind reveals the discussion.
And of course
On Apr 11, 10:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This question was posed to me today. Given a C/C++ program we can clearly
embed a Python interpreter in it. Is it possible to fire up multiple
interpreters in multiple threads? For example:
C++ main
thread 1
On Apr 11, 6:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I wind up with two completely independent interpreters, one per thread?
I'm thinking this doesn't work (there are bits which aren't thread-safe and
are only protected by the GIL), but wanted to double-check to be sure.
You can create a new
On Apr 11, 6:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I wind up with two completely independent interpreters, one per thread?
I'm thinking this doesn't work (there are bits which aren't thread-safe and
are only protected by the GIL), but wanted to double-check to be sure.
You can create a new
On Apr 12, 7:05 pm, sturlamolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In theory, a GIL private to each (sub)interpreter would make Python
more scalable. The current GIL behaves like the BKL in earlier Linux
kernels. However, some third-party software, notably Apache's
mod_python, is claimed to depend on
On Apr 13, 3:05 am, sturlamolden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 11, 6:24 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I wind up with two completely independent interpreters, one per thread?
I'm thinking this doesn't work (there are bits which aren't thread-safe and
are only protected by the GIL), but
This question was posed to me today. Given a C/C++ program we can clearly
embed a Python interpreter in it. Is it possible to fire up multiple
interpreters in multiple threads? For example:
C++ main
thread 1
Py_Initialize()
thread 2
Py_Initialize()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
This question was posed to me today. Given a C/C++ program we can clearly
embed a Python interpreter in it. Is it possible to fire up multiple
interpreters in multiple threads? For example:
C++ main
thread 1
Py_Initialize()
On Apr 11, 9:24 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This question was posed to me today. Given a C/C++ program we can clearly
embed a Python interpreter in it. Is it possible to fire up multiple
interpreters in multiple threads? For example:
C++ main
thread 1
2008/4/11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This question was posed to me today. Given a C/C++ program we can clearly
embed a Python interpreter in it. Is it possible to fire up multiple
interpreters in multiple threads? For example:
C++ main
thread 1
Hi,You will only have one the different static Python variables,
so this is not possible.
Thanks, that's pretty much what I expected...
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
12 matches
Mail list logo
