Jeffrey Barish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> Jeffrey> With the release of multiprocessing in Python 2.6, is there
>> any Jeffrey> reason to use Pyro or RPyC?
>>
>> As far as I know the multiprocessing module only works on one machine
>> (multi-cpu or mult
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Jeffrey> With the release of multiprocessing in Python 2.6, is there
> any Jeffrey> reason to use Pyro or RPyC?
>
> As far as I know the multiprocessing module only works on one machine
> (multi-cpu or multi-core), not across machines.
So I thought at first,
Jeffrey> With the release of multiprocessing in Python 2.6, is there any
Jeffrey> reason to use Pyro or RPyC?
As far as I know the multiprocessing module only works on one machine
(multi-cpu or multi-core), not across machines.
--
Skip Montanaro - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://smontanaro.d
With the release of multiprocessing in Python 2.6, is there any reason to
use Pyro or RPyC?
--
Jeffrey Barish
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
