Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-16 Thread Roel Schroeven
Scott David Daniels wrote: This, of course, means that DJIJSTRA (there, one of the J's is right) SUX!!! And so do DONALD NUTH, BRIAN ERNIGHAN, ROB PIE, EN THOMPSON, JOHN CARMAC, FRED BROOS, NIKAUS WIRTH, ONRAD ZUSE AND STEVE WOZNIA!! ;) -- "Codito ergo sum" Roel Schroeven -- http://mail.pytho

Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-16 Thread Scott David Daniels
Martijn Faassen wrote: It's slow and no scientific research exists in its favor! Also it doesn't work. Why would I need polymorphism? Lisp had all of this 50 years ago anyway. But functional programming by the way SUX TOO! So does procedural programming! And structured programming SUX, GOTO all

Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-16 Thread Martijn Faassen
Peter Hansen wrote: Brian van den Broek wrote: Peter Hansen said unto the world upon 2004-12-15 17:39: I could easily see this thread descending into a flame war in, oh, about another ten posts. That would be so freaky... Without a doubt that is the most ignorant and small-minded thought that ev

Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-16 Thread Fredrik Lundh
> Isn't there a comp.lang.flame or something? comp.lang.object ? (there don't seem to be a comp.lang.procedural ...) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-15 Thread Eric Pederson
> "Jive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> taunted: > > > Subject: NO REALLY > > > > Isn't there a comp.lang.flame or something? > Oh, my, don't you have BIG CAPS! Someone should wash them, thoroughly! Why don't you come up to my r

Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-15 Thread Peter Hansen
Brian van den Broek wrote: Peter Hansen said unto the world upon 2004-12-15 17:39: I could easily see this thread descending into a flame war in, oh, about another ten posts. That would be so freaky... Without a doubt that is the most ignorant and small-minded thought that ever has been, and ever

Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-15 Thread Brian van den Broek
Peter Hansen said unto the world upon 2004-12-15 17:39: Martijn Faassen wrote: Jive wrote: Isn't there a comp.lang.flame or something? I've doublechecked, but I didn't see any significant flaming in this article (and I'm generally not very tolerant of it). My PSU posting was certainly not intend

Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-15 Thread Peter Hansen
Martijn Faassen wrote: Jive wrote: Isn't there a comp.lang.flame or something? I've doublechecked, but I didn't see any significant flaming in this article (and I'm generally not very tolerant of it). My PSU posting was certainly not intended as a flame, in case that was misinterpreted. What'd I

Re: NO REALLY

2004-12-15 Thread Martijn Faassen
Jive wrote: Isn't there a comp.lang.flame or something? I've doublechecked, but I didn't see any significant flaming in this article (and I'm generally not very tolerant of it). My PSU posting was certainly not intended as a flame, in case that was misinterpreted. What'd I miss? Regards, Martijn

NO REALLY

2004-12-15 Thread Jive
Isn't there a comp.lang.flame or something? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list