On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 2:26:48 AM UTC+1, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 9:21:24 PM UTC-4, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 11:36:06 AM UTC+12, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> >
> > > Didn't we already do this debate?
> >
> > I understand. You want
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:19 am, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 10:43:01 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> Yes. The two ways of ending the loop are distinct and different:
>>
>> - reach the end, and stop;
>> - bail out early.
>>
>>
>> When you read a book, there are two w
On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 10:43:01 PM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Yes. The two ways of ending the loop are distinct and different:
>
> - reach the end, and stop;
> - bail out early.
>
>
> When you read a book, there are two ways of stopping:
>
> - reach the end, and run out of pages t
On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 6:52:45 PM UTC-4, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 1:26:48 PM UTC+12, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> > I'm merely pointing out that your concern about multiple ways to exit loops
> > sounds like exactly what was discussed here two months ago.
>
> And
On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 1:26:48 PM UTC+12, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> I'm merely pointing out that your concern about multiple ways to exit loops
> sounds like exactly what was discussed here two months ago.
And one could point out that your presentation on Python loops sounds exactly
like ever
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> When you read a book, there are two ways of stopping:
>
> - reach the end, and run out of pages to read, so you stop;
> - give up reading early, and just put the book away.
>
> (Or possibly throw the book across the room.)
>
Or someone migh
On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:05 am, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 12:08:30 PM UTC+12, bream...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> A couple or three years old but this is well worth seeing for anybody,
>> regardless of your Python expertise.
>> http://nedbatchelder.com/text/iter.html
>
>
On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 9:21:24 PM UTC-4, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 11:36:06 AM UTC+12, Ned Batchelder wrote:
>
> > Didn't we already do this debate?
>
> I understand. You want to discuss loops, just not *those* sorts of loops...
I didn't post this link her
On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 11:36:06 AM UTC+12, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> Didn't we already do this debate?
I understand. You want to discuss loops, just not *those* sorts of loops...
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 7:36:06 PM UTC-4, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 6:06:27 PM UTC-4, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 12:08:30 PM UTC+12, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > A couple or three years old but this is well worth seeing for a
On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 6:06:27 PM UTC-4, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 12:08:30 PM UTC+12, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> > A couple or three years old but this is well worth seeing for anybody,
> > regardless of your Python expertise. http://nedbatchelder.com/tex
On Saturday, August 6, 2016 at 12:08:30 PM UTC+12, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> A couple or three years old but this is well worth seeing for anybody,
> regardless of your Python expertise. http://nedbatchelder.com/text/iter.html
A loop like
for i in ... :
...
if ... cond ... :
A couple or three years old but this is well worth seeing for anybody,
regardless of your Python expertise. http://nedbatchelder.com/text/iter.html
Kindest regards.
Mark Lawrence.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
13 matches
Mail list logo
