Re: New Science Discovery: Perl Detracters Remain Idiots After A Decade!

2012-03-01 Thread Seymour J.
In fgD3r.7862$_63.3...@newsfe19.iad, on 03/01/2012 at 04:52 AM, Chiron chiron...@gmail.com said: Yes. That (the mathematically defined way) is a particular way, is it not? No. There is no the mathematically defined way. However, I wasn't specifically referring to infix/postfix/prefix or

Re: New Science Discovery: Perl Detracters Remain Idiots After A Decade!

2012-02-29 Thread Seymour J.
In ubo3r.20367$kv1.9...@newsfe03.iad, on 02/29/2012 at 11:43 AM, Chiron chiron...@gmail.com said: Sure, mathematically it *should* go a particular way, No. Mathematically it should go the way that it is defined to go. There is nothing in Mathematics that either requires or prohibits infix

Re: New Science Discovery: Perl Detracters Remain Idiots After A Decade!

2012-02-29 Thread Chiron
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:06:42 -0500, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote: In ubo3r.20367$kv1.9...@newsfe03.iad, on 02/29/2012 at 11:43 AM, Chiron chiron...@gmail.com said: Sure, mathematically it *should* go a particular way, No. Mathematically it should go the way that it is defined to go.