On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:09:13 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 03:18 PM, alister wrote:
>
>
>>> As is argueing against a real position instead of making something up.
>>> Nobody is argueing for arbitrary indentation.
>> May I suggest that you give it a try for a month, perhaps re-writi
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:44:15 +0100, BartC wrote:
> On 16/04/2015 14:18, alister wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:07:22 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>
>>> Nobody is argueing for arbitrary indentation.
>>
>> May I suggest that you give it a try for a month, perhaps re-writing a
>> small program you
On 16/04/2015 14:44, BartC wrote:
* I modify code a lot, adding and removing extra nested blocks all the
time. My editor can't indent or un-indent blocks without a lot of manual
typing. With block-delimited schemes, this isn't an issue, as temporary
lack of correct indentation isn't crucial.
On 04/16/2015 03:18 PM, alister wrote:
>
>> As is argueing against a real position instead of making something up.
>> Nobody is argueing for arbitrary indentation.
> May I suggest that you give it a try for a month, perhaps re-writing a
> small program you already have in a pythonic style (don't
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:18 PM, alister
wrote:
> be warned you may find it creates (or increases ) an extreme dislike for
> C & other languages that require braces & semicolons, it did for me
> (especially the semi-colon!)
I'd just like to add to this that the lack of semicolon in Python
works
On 16/04/2015 14:18, alister wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:07:22 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Nobody is argueing for arbitrary indentation.
May I suggest that you give it a try for a month, perhaps re-writing a
small program you already have in a pythonic style (don't simply write c
in python
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 13:07:22 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 12:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Thursday 16 April 2015 20:09, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>
>>> I beg to differ. The most common occurence is a loop with a break
>>> condition in the middle I would prefer such a loop to be w
