2006/9/6, Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> enigmadude wrote:
> > As many have heard, IronPython 1.0 was released. When I was looking
> > through the listed differences between CPython and IronPython, the
> > document mentioned that using large exponents such as 10 **
> > 735293857239475 will cau
Georg Brandl wrote:
> enigmadude wrote:
> > As many have heard, IronPython 1.0 was released. When I was looking
> > through the listed differences between CPython and IronPython, the
> > document mentioned that using large exponents such as 10 **
> > 735293857239475 will cause CPython to hang, wher
enigmadude wrote:
> As many have heard, IronPython 1.0 was released. When I was looking
> through the listed differences between CPython and IronPython, the
> document mentioned that using large exponents such as 10 **
> 735293857239475 will cause CPython to hang, whereas IronPython will
> raise a
Robin Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> enigmadude wrote:
>> As many have heard, IronPython 1.0 was released. When I was looking
>> through the listed differences between CPython and IronPython, the
>> document mentioned that using large exponents such as 10 **
>> 735293857239475 will cause CPyt
enigmadude wrote:
> As many have heard, IronPython 1.0 was released. When I was looking
> through the listed differences between CPython and IronPython, the
> document mentioned that using large exponents such as 10 **
> 735293857239475 will cause CPython to hang, whereas IronPython will
> raise a
As many have heard, IronPython 1.0 was released. When I was looking
through the listed differences between CPython and IronPython, the
document mentioned that using large exponents such as 10 **
735293857239475 will cause CPython to hang, whereas IronPython will
raise a ValueError. Trying this on m
