Re: OT: Sarcasm and irony (was: Dive Into Java?)

2006-10-10 Thread bryan rasmussen
> > > > > E. g. [in Java there is] no operator overloading, but "+" > > > concatenation of strings. What if you'd like to implement your own > > > string-derived class? Ah, never mind. Operator overloading is > > > bad(tm) ;) <= Irony, definitely > > > > Definitely? That one strikes me more as sarc

Re: OT: Sarcasm and irony (was: Dive Into Java?)

2006-10-09 Thread Theerasak Photha
On 10/9/06, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bjoern Schliessmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > E. g. [in Java there is] no operator overloading, but "+" > > concatenation of strings. What if you'd like to implement your own > > string-derived class? Ah, never mind. Operator overloading i

OT: Sarcasm and irony (was: Dive Into Java?)

2006-10-09 Thread Ben Finney
Bjoern Schliessmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > E. g. [in Java there is] no operator overloading, but "+" > concatenation of strings. What if you'd like to implement your own > string-derived class? Ah, never mind. Operator overloading is > bad(tm) ;) <= Irony, definitely Definitely? That one s