Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Steve Holden
Paul Rubin wrote: > Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>There is a difference between what is *illegal* and what constitutes >>>a *crime*. >> >>Why thank you, you've really made my day. That's the funniest thing I've >>heard in months. Please, do tell, which brand of corn flakes was i

Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Paul Rubin
Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There is a difference between what is *illegal* and what constitutes > > a *crime*. > > Why thank you, you've really made my day. That's the funniest thing I've > heard in months. Please, do tell, which brand of corn flakes was it that > you got your

Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:56:44 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > > >>There is a difference between what is *illegal* and what constitutes >>a *crime*. > > > Why thank you, you've really made my day. That's the funniest thing I've > heard in months. Please, do tell, which bran

Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Tim Daneliuk
Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 04:34:20 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > > > >>A) I don't much care if people wander off topic from time to time - >>that's what filters are for. But as a matter of general courtesy >>is it too much to ask that the subject line be so marked? >

Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:29:26 +0100, Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote: > Now, tell me: is the polluting of a newsgroup with off-topic postings, > a crime, Not in any nation that values personal freedom over petty laws controlling people's behaviour for no good purpose. -- Steven. -- http://mail.pytho

Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Arthur
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 23:25:45 +1100, Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Accounting software comes to mind. But just because Microsoft >did not, or was unable to, illegally squelch competition in one market >does not excuse them for doing so in another. Just as a factual matter, while Mic

Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread venk
Hi, Though out of the streamline, I find your post to be one of the most reasonable and well-formed arguments I have read in a long time. Keep it up. Great work. Steven D'Aprano wrote: Real standards, like TCP/IP which is the backbone of the Internet, aren't controlled by any one company. Anyone

Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Jerzy Karczmarczuk
Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Jaywalking is a crime. So is littering. So is merely belonging to certain > organisations, such as the German Nazi party or any number of allegedly > terrorist groups. Walking around naked in public is a crime, and in many > places in the world, including the USA, you then

Re: OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 04:34:20 -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > A) I don't much care if people wander off topic from time to time - > that's what filters are for. But as a matter of general courtesy > is it too much to ask that the subject line be so marked? Fair enough. > B) Rhetoric is not

OT - Re: Microsoft Hatred FAQ

2005-11-03 Thread Tim Daneliuk
David Blomstrom wrote: > "Everytime someone compares MS's behavior with some > less controversial criminal behavior, you act like > they > accused MS of holding people up at gunpoint." > > Screwing literally millions of consumers and taxpayers > and holding entire schools hostage is far worse tha