i know about the ban but since marko was getting it was wondering how
thanks !
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
Ranting Rick is banned from posting to python-list. (And maybe also
> from other Python project lists, I'm not sure about that.)
> You can read abou
i did not see rick's mail on my gmail
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
Rick Johnson :
>
> > Michael F. Stemper wrote:
> >> Object-oriented philosophy
> > [...] [...] [...]
> >
> > So, to make a long story sh
On 2018-09-11 01:59, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Rick Johnson :
>
>> Michael F. Stemper wrote:
>>> Object-oriented philosophy
>> [...] [...] [...]
>>
>> So, to make a long story short, you may want to do some
>> googling...
>
> Long story short, Mic
Rick Johnson :
> Michael F. Stemper wrote:
>> Object-oriented philosophy
> [...] [...] [...]
>
> So, to make a long story short, you may want to do some
> googling...
Long story short, Michael, Rick is a masterful troll extraordinaire.
Highly amusing when you're in t
On 07-09-18 22:08, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
>
>> try
>>id = xmlmodel.attrib['name']
>> except KeyError:
>>id = "constant power"
> Never mind! After I continued testing, I realized that the above
> should have been written as:
>
> if 'name' in xmlmodel.attrib:
> id = xmlmodel.attrib
just see who a company employ as a py eng, ask him.
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
>
> Does anyone here know anyone who would refer to themselves as a "Python
> engineer" with a straight face? I merely ask...
>
> -- Thomas
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mai
Le jeu. 6 sept. 2018 à 16:05, Michael F. Stemper
a écrit :
>
> How does one judge when it's worthwhile to do this and when it's
> not? What criteria would somebody seasoned in OO and python use
> to say "good idea" vs "don't waste your time"?
>
I may qualify as experienced with Python, that being
On Sunday 09 September 2018 08:19:52 Gilmeh Serda wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 18:07:55 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> >> Also, get someone, preferrable a python engineer to review your
> >> code.
> >
> > Does anyone here know anyone who would refer to themselves as a
> > "Python engineer" with a
On 2018-09-06 16:04, Stefan Ram wrote:
> "Michael F. Stemper" writes:
>>> You have a operation »Resistance( V )«.
>> Mathematically, that's an operation, I suppose. I tend to think of it
>> as either a function or a method.
>
> I deliberately did not use neither "a function" nor
> "a method"
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 16:07:06 -0500, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
>>> In another case where I had a "bare exception", I was using it to see
>>> if something was defined and substitute a default value if it wasn't.
>>> Have I cleaned this up properly?
>>>
>>> try
>>> id = xmlmodel.attrib['name']
On 2018-09-07 15:39, MRAB wrote:
> On 2018-09-07 20:51, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
>> On 2018-09-06 16:00, MRAB wrote:
>>> A word of advice: don't use a "bare" except, i.e. one that doesn't
>>> specify what exception(s) it should catch.
>>
>> Given that I moved the first line ("P_0s = ...") out of
On 2018-09-07 21:08, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 2018-09-07 14:51, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 2018-09-06 16:00, MRAB wrote:
On 2018-09-06 21:24, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
A word of advice: don't use a "bare" except, i.e. one that doesn't
specify what exception(s) it should catch.
In an
On 2018-09-07 20:51, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 2018-09-06 16:00, MRAB wrote:
On 2018-09-06 21:24, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 2018-09-06 09:35, Rhodri James wrote:
Is it worth creating the superclass in Python? It sounds like it's a
bit marginal in your case. I'm not that seasoned in o
On 2018-09-07 14:51, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
> On 2018-09-06 16:00, MRAB wrote:
>> On 2018-09-06 21:24, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
>> A word of advice: don't use a "bare" except, i.e. one that doesn't
>> specify what exception(s) it should catch.
> In another case where I had a "bare exception",
On 2018-09-06 16:00, MRAB wrote:
> On 2018-09-06 21:24, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
>> On 2018-09-06 09:35, Rhodri James wrote:
>>> Is it worth creating the superclass in Python? It sounds like it's a
>>> bit marginal in your case. I'm not that seasoned in object-oriented
>>> design either, but my
On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 22:00:26 +0100, MRAB wrote:
> On 2018-09-06 21:24, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
[...]
>>try:
>> P_0s = xmlmodel.findall( 'RatedPower' )[0].text
>> self.P_0 = float( P_0s )
>>except:
[...]
> A word of advice: don't use a "bare" except, i.e. one that doesn't
> sp
On 2018-09-06 21:24, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 2018-09-06 09:35, Rhodri James wrote:
On 06/09/18 15:04, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
Net net is that the only thing that ended up being common was the
__init__ methods. Two of the classes have identical __init__
methods; the third has a superset o
On 2018-09-06 12:32, Stefan Ram wrote:
> "Michael F. Stemper" writes:
>> Is there really any benefit to this change? Yes, I've eliminated
>> some (a few lines per class) duplicate code. On the other hand,
>> I've added the parent class and the (probably small, but not
>> non-existent) overhead of
On 2018-09-06 10:40, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> Also, get someone, preferrable a python engineer to review your code.
Sounds like an advertisement to me.
--
Michael F. Stemper
Why doesn't anybody care about apathy?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2018-09-06 09:35, Rhodri James wrote:
> On 06/09/18 15:04, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
>> Net net is that the only thing that ended up being common was the
>> __init__ methods. Two of the classes have identical __init__
>> methods; the third has a superset of that method. The other methods
>> all
On 2018-09-06 09:34, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> "Michael F. Stemper" :
>
>> Since the three classes all had common methods (by design), I
>> thought that maybe refactoring these three classes to inherit from
>> a parent class would be beneficial. I went ahead and did so.
>> (Outlines of before and af
On 09/06/2018 09:07 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
On 2018-09-06 17:40, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
Also, get someone, preferrable a python engineer to review your code.
Does anyone here know anyone who would refer to themselves as a "Python
engineer" with a straight face? I merely ask...
-- T
On 2018-09-06 17:40, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> Also, get someone, preferrable a python engineer to review your code.
Does anyone here know anyone who would refer to themselves as a "Python
engineer" with a straight face? I merely ask...
-- Thomas
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
Also, get someone, preferrable a python engineer to review your code.
yours,
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
https://github.com/Abdur-rahmaanJ
Mauritius
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 06/09/18 15:04, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
Net net is that the only thing that ended up being common was the
__init__ methods. Two of the classes have identical __init__
methods; the third has a superset of that method. The other methods
all have completely different implementations. This isn't
"Michael F. Stemper" :
> Since the three classes all had common methods (by design), I
> thought that maybe refactoring these three classes to inherit from
> a parent class would be beneficial. I went ahead and did so.
> (Outlines of before and after are at the end of the post.)
>
> Net net is tha
Over the summer, I've been working on a simulation. After months
of design and redesign, I finally coded it up in two days over
Labor Day weekend. Works great.
The core of the simulation is a set of models of three different
types of electrical loads (characterized based on how they respond
to vol
27 matches
Mail list logo
