Re: Optional algol syntax style

2005-09-06 Thread Mike Meyer
Christoph Rackwitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You didn't quite get the OP's intention, I guess. The OP wanted Python to be a bit more freeform by adding end tags. That might be an improvement for web scripting, but I haven't seen the solutions of the existing frameworks and won't dare to

Re: Optional algol syntax style

2005-09-05 Thread Christoph Rackwitz
You didn't quite get the OP's intention, I guess. The OP wanted Python to be a bit more freeform by adding end tags. That might be an improvement for web scripting, but I haven't seen the solutions of the existing frameworks and won't dare to compare. --

Optional algol syntax style

2005-09-05 Thread Sokolov Yura
I think, allowing to specify blocks with algol style (for-end, if-end, etc) will allow to write easy php-like templates and would attract new web developers to python (as php and ruby do). It can be straight compilled into Python bytecode cause there is one-to-one transformation. So this: # -*-

Re: Optional algol syntax style

2005-09-05 Thread Mikael Olofsson
Sokolov Yura wrote: I think, allowing to specify blocks with algol style (for-end, if-end, etc) will allow to write easy php-like templates and would attract new web developers to python (as php and ruby do). It can be straight compilled into Python bytecode cause there is one-to-one