But sometimes you just wanna do it the way you wanna do it. If you
name your tests like 'test_01_yadda' and test_02_whatever', then they
will be run in the order you want, as given by the numbers.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:35:12 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ulrich Eckhardt writes:
>
>> However, sometimes it doesn't make sense to run test_bar() if
>> test_foo() already failed, because they basically build upon each
>> other.
>
> That's a mistake. If the success of ‘test_bar’ depends on the res
Ulrich Eckhardt writes:
> However, sometimes it doesn't make sense to run test_bar() if
> test_foo() already failed, because they basically build upon each
> other.
That's a mistake. If the success of ‘test_bar’ depends on the result of
‘test_foo’, then it's not an independent test and therefore
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> I'm currently working on a testsuite using Python's unittest library. This
> works all good and fine, but there's one thing where I haven't seen an
> elegant solution to yet, and that is the ordering. Currently, it takes all
> classes and orders them alphabetically and the
Hello!
I'm currently working on a testsuite using Python's unittest library. This
works all good and fine, but there's one thing where I haven't seen an
elegant solution to yet, and that is the ordering. Currently, it takes all
classes and orders them alphabetically and then takes all test functio
