Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: PPC OSX vs. x86 Linux

2005-04-11 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Apr 11, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Joshua Ginsberg wrote: On Apr 10, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote: On Apr 10, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Joshua Ginsberg wrote: I writing some python code to do some analysis of my mail logs. I took a 10,000 line snippet from them (the files are about 5-6 million usually)

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: PPC OSX vs. x86 Linux

2005-04-11 Thread Joshua Ginsberg
Well, I compiled a fresh version of Python 2.3.5 from python.org to test the datetime theory... and I'm still getting 150sec execution times. :-/ I'm gonna test the string vs. strop now... -jag <>Joshua Ginsberg -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brainstorm Internet Network Operations 970-247-1442 x131 On Ap

Re: PPC OSX vs. x86 Linux

2005-04-09 Thread Maurice LING
Sells, Fred wrote: I'm no expert on internals, but I seem to recall that in the past, the string module could be implemented in either C or Python and I think there is a strop module that is related to all this. Could it be that on the Mac, your string processing is using interpreted Python byte c

RE: PPC OSX vs. x86 Linux

2005-04-09 Thread Sells, Fred
linux uses c? -Original Message- From: Joshua Ginsberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PPC OSX vs. x86 Linux Hello -- I writing some python code to do some analysis of my mail logs. I took a 10,000 line snippet from them (the

PPC OSX vs. x86 Linux

2005-04-08 Thread Joshua Ginsberg
Hello -- I writing some python code to do some analysis of my mail logs. I took a 10,000 line snippet from them (the files are about 5-6 million usually) to test my code with. I'm developing it on a Powerbook G4 1.2GHz with 1.25GB of RAM and the Apple distributed Python* and I tested my code on