namekuseijin namekusei...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it completely unimaginable that people would even think
suggesting the idea that Java is simpler. It's one of the most stupidly
verbose and cranky languages out there, to the point you can't really do
anything of relevance without an IDE
Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@suttoncourtenay.org.uk wrote:
namekuseijin namekusei...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it completely unimaginable that people would even think
suggesting the idea that Java is simpler. It's one of the most stupidly
verbose and cranky languages out there, to the point you
Sion Arrowsmith wrote:
OTOH, I consider it a productive day if I end up with fewer lines of code
than I started with.
A friend once justified a negative LOC count as being the sign of a
good day with the following observation:
Code that doesn't exist contains no bugs.
Code that doesn't exist
Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Sion Arrowsmith wrote:
Once, when faced with a rather hairy problem that client requirements
dictated a pure Java solution for, I coded up a fully functional
prototype in Python to get the logic sorted out, and then translated
it. [And it wasn't pleasant.]
On May 21, 7:47 am, s...@viridian.paintbox (Sion Arrowsmith) wrote:
Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@suttoncourtenay.org.uk wrote:
namekuseijin namekusei...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it completely unimaginable that people would even think
suggesting the idea that Java is simpler. It's one of the
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:21 PM, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:43 PM, namekuseijin namekusei...@gmail.com wrote:
someone said:
If you took a look at Java, you would
notice that the core language syntax is much simpler than Python's.
thanks for the laughs
On May 20, 6:46 pm, namekuseijin namekusei...@gmail.com wrote:
anyway, again, thanks for the laughs.
I'm a Java developer in my day job, and I use Jython for testing out
ideas and prototyping, due to the way Jython makes writing Java so
much easier... Those examples were spot on - things weren't
Ant escreveu:
# Python
fh = open(myfile.txt)
for line in fh:
print line
// Java
...
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new FileReader
(myfile.txt));
String line = reader.readLine();
while (line != null) {
System.out.println(line);
}
...
And that's without all of the
In article gv1nor$10u...@adenine.netfront.net,
namekuseijin namekusei...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it completely unimaginable that people would even think
suggesting the idea that Java is simpler. It's one of the most stupidly
verbose and cranky languages out there, to the point you can't
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Aahz a...@pythoncraft.com wrote:
In article mff7e6-e43@satorlaser.homedns.org,
Ulrich Eckhardt eckha...@satorlaser.com wrote:
Steve Ferg wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error checking, etc.), and rely on them to
provide the high level of support needed to be reasonably productive
in heavy-weight languages (e.g. Java).
On the other hand there are developers
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 10:42 -0700, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Benchmarks always test for a given feature. The available benchmarks
will most likely not test the feature relevant for your particular
application simply because there are about a gazillion different ways
of using a web framework. So
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Daniel Fetchinson
fetchin...@googlemail.com wrote:
On the one hand, there are developers who love big IDEs with lots of
features (code generation, error checking, etc.), and rely on them to
provide the high level of support needed to be reasonably
Ah! I should have been careful before asking such general question about
performance. I agree with you. But mine was more academic. I should not given
a specific example.
AFAIK, for java on the client side, JVM performance is one of the critical
things which has been tuned to death until
someone said:
If you took a look at Java, you would
notice that the core language syntax is much simpler than Python's.
thanks for the laughs whoever you are!
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:43 PM, namekuseijin namekusei...@gmail.com wrote:
someone said:
If you took a look at Java, you would
notice that the core language syntax is much simpler than Python's.
thanks for the laughs whoever you are!
I'm no Java fan, but I do agree that the core language
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:21 PM, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:43 PM, namekuseijin namekusei...@gmail.com wrote:
someone said:
If you took a look at Java, you would
notice that the core language syntax is much simpler than Python's.
thanks for the laughs
My experience has been that if the execution stays
inside the VM, then for a server side application, the
JVM is faster, and proportionally even faster when there
are more threads ready to do something.
When the VM has to do a lot of interaction with the
OS, then I think it is difficult to make
18 matches
Mail list logo
