Re: Please keep the full address

2008-03-07 Thread Michael Wieher
I normally find this kind of back & forth useless and annoying spam but the irony is too much to avoid commenting. (read the following, then ...) > > > > "His" posts? > > > > Whatever. I'm too old to worry about searching for politically correct, > > gender neutral pronouns. > > > I'm pretty sur

Re: Please keep the full address

2008-03-06 Thread castironpi
> > > > I'm talking about castironpi.  I find his posts a waste of my time > > > > "His" posts? > > > Whatever.  I'm too old to worry about searching for politically correct, > > gender neutral pronouns. > > I'm pretty sure even the most PC people wouldn't suggest using a > masculine pronoun for an

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread castironpi
On Mar 6, 10:47 am, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST) > > Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't want to have to tag every thread.  I just want to *plonk* > > > certain posters. > > > > Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I gue

Re: Please keep the full address

2008-03-06 Thread Carl Banks
On Mar 6, 11:41 am, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:00:58 -0800 (PST) > > Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm talking about castironpi. I find his posts a waste of my time > > > "His" posts? > > Whatever. I'm too old to worry about searching for p

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:58:06 -0800 (PST) Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't want to have to tag every thread. I just want to *plonk* > > certain posters. > > > > Anyway, I'll live with Google's failings I guess. > > Sounds like you need better filtering. > > A decent news filter sh

Re: Please keep the full address

2008-03-06 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:00:58 -0800 (PST) Carl Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm talking about castironpi. I find his posts a waste of my time > > "His" posts? Whatever. I'm too old to worry about searching for politically correct, gender neutral pronouns. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Please keep the full address

2008-03-06 Thread Carl Banks
On Mar 5, 8:07 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:00:17 -0800 (PST) > > Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What are you talking about? I didn't change the address at all. I'm > > not even sure what you mean. Are you talking about the post subject > >

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-06 Thread Carl Banks
On Mar 5, 8:11 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100 > > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop > > > the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this > > > imposs

Re: Please keep the full address

2008-03-06 Thread Mike Driscoll
On Mar 5, 7:07 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:00:17 -0800 (PST) > > Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What are you talking about? I didn't change the address at all. I'm > > not even sure what you mean. Are you talking about the post subject > >

Re: Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-05 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:36:29 +1100 Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop > > the responses to their posts and changing the address makes this > > impossible. > > Not at all. AFAIK the messages from Google mail correctly include

Re: Please keep the full address

2008-03-05 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 14:00:17 -0800 (PST) Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What are you talking about? I didn't change the address at all. I'm > not even sure what you mean. Are you talking about the post subject > line (which I have never touched in any post)? If you're talking about > the

Identifying messages in a thread (was: Please keep the full address)

2008-03-05 Thread Ben Finney
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:38:59 -0800 (PST) > Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 5, 12:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm not sure why you change the address like this but could you > please include the full address. It's a misfe

Re: Please keep the full address

2008-03-05 Thread Mike Driscoll
On Mar 5, 3:51 pm, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:38:59 -0800 (PST) > > Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 5, 12:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I'm not sure why you change the address like this but could you please > include the full addr

Please keep the full address

2008-03-05 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:38:59 -0800 (PST) Mike Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 5, 12:50 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure why you change the address like this but could you please include the full address. Those of us who identify the time wasters would also like to drop the re