On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, 05:56 Michael Torrie, wrote:
>
> My mistake. I see now that it was something you forwarded to the list
> from someone else.
>
> Doesn't change my reply, though. Whoever said it, it's not very
> relevant. Who's "us" and what is it the Python gives them that Julia
> will soon
On 1/6/20 6:33 PM, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> No, i did not write that, it's not Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote rather
My mistake. I see now that it was something you forwarded to the list
from someone else.
Doesn't change my reply, though. Whoever said it, it's not very
relevant. Who's
No, i did not write that, it's not Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote rather
-- Forwarded message -
From: *AAKASH JANA*
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 21:15
Subject: Re: Python, Be Bold! - The Draft
To: Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
Please forward it to aakashjana2...@gmail.com
On Tue,
On 1/6/20 10:24 AM, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> Maybe but if you know or have heard of Julia the language. You will realise
> its going to take over what python gives us. So i think there is urgent
> need for upgrades to newer versions of python to make basic tasks on python
> way quicker.
N
-- Forwarded message -
From: AAKASH JANA
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 21:15
Subject: Re: Python, Be Bold! - The Draft
To: Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
Maybe but if you know or have heard of Julia the language. You will realise
its going to take over what python gives us. So i think there
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 21:01 Chris Angelico, wrote:
>
> Don't worry. It's trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist, in a
> platform-specific way, imitating a completely different execution
> model, and ultimately is just reinventing what pip already does. You
> can safely ignore it for plenty of
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 20:46 Rhodri James, wrote:
>
> I'm an embedded systems programmer. Congratulations, you have just
> rendered your draft utterly irrelevant to me and those like me.
>
If you followed the previous thread there was some misunderstanding as to
what do i mean by executable, sorry
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 18:37 o1bigtenor, wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm just slow but it really seems like what you are trying to
> achieve is
> a java like system.
>
> Wouldn't you find it easier to just use java rather than trying to remake
> Python into Java? (It would be easier imo.)
>
It proposes to enh
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 3:47 AM Rhodri James wrote:
>
> On 06/01/2020 10:21, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> > Before we begin, we'd like to define the term executable used in the context
> > of this draft. It means an archive that is run by double-clicking.
>
> I'm an embedded systems programmer
On 06/01/2020 10:21, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
Before we begin, we'd like to define the term executable used in the context
of this draft. It means an archive that is run by double-clicking.
I'm an embedded systems programmer. Congratulations, you have just
rendered your draft utterly i
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 4:23 AM Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
wrote:
>
> Note: Prepared a draft on the previous discussion, motivated by the vision
> of
> an era where the world swarms in Python apps. This draft is not a PEP, at
> least
> not yet. It's structure approaches a PEP but takes liberties as n
Note: Prepared a draft on the previous discussion, motivated by the vision
of
an era where the world swarms in Python apps. This draft is not a PEP, at
least
not yet. It's structure approaches a PEP but takes liberties as necessary.
It
includes info deemed as essential. Thanking list members for th
12 matches
Mail list logo
