In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>To try and ensure this thread dies for ever, I have added a note to the
>blog entry at
>
> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
>noting the fact that this was indeed an April Fool's joke.
Steve Holden
>> It was an April Fool's joke. It's not actually true.
>>
> To try and ensure this thread dies for ever, I have added a note to the
> blog entry at
>
> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
> noting the fact that this was indeed an April Fool's j
Robert Kern wrote:
> Francisco Reyes wrote:
>
>>Shane Hathaway writes:
>>
>>
>>>I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
>>>developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
>>>ooutright open source llicenssing?
>>
>>I disagree with the change. I th
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Shane Hathaway writes:
>
>>I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
>>developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
>>ooutright open source llicenssing?
>
> I disagree with the change. I think Steve Holden is right.
>
Shane Hathaway writes:
> I must saay that i am fully in favor of this change. The ppython
> developerrs need to eat too. Iis no one ellse aware off the perils oof
> ooutright open source llicenssing?
I disagree with the change. I think Steve Holden is right.
1- How do you enforce this?
2- Th
Philippe Martin wrote:
> That was nasty Steve - at least I'm ready for any kind of bad new today ;-)
>
Sorry ;-)
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd www.holdenweb.com
Love me, love my blog holdenweb.blogspot.com
--
That was nasty Steve - at least I'm ready for any kind of bad new today ;-)
Regards,
Philippe
Steve Holden wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described
> in
>
>http://pyfound.b
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
>recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
>I would like to place on reco
"walterbyrd" wrote:
> Please post a link to the original article. Not just a post to a blog.
the pyfound blog is the official PSF blog; it's linked from the PSF:s
homepage:
http://www.python.org/psf/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve Holden wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
> > On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Is this an April fool's joke?
> >
> >
> > Did you read the blog entry?
> >
> I suspect he didn't. I'm guessing that eventually we'll have to remove
> the blog entry just so's nobobdy's t
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Is this an April fool's joke?
>
>
> Did you read the blog entry?
>
I suspect he didn't. I'm guessing that eventually we'll have to remove
the blog entry just so's nobobdy's tempted to take it seriously.
regards
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
>>recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>>
>> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-
Grant Edwards a écrit :
> On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
>>recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>>
>> http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensi
On 2006-04-01, walterbyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this an April fool's joke?
Did you read the blog entry?
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I will invent "TIDY
at BOWL"...
visi.com
Is this an April fool's joke?
Please post a link to the original article. Not just a post to a blog.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>
>Hmmm... after due consideration (and reading the announcmement
>properly), I support this license change in full.
>
>
>
If I could read past the first paragraph do you think I would really
hang onto this newsgroup asking stupid questions?!
The personal harm caused readers of this announc
Fuzzyman wrote:
>
From the site:
"Advanced Program for Research In Licensing, whose First Object-Oriented
License"
string = "Advanced Program for Research In Licensing, whose First
Object-Oriented License"
for letter in string:
if ord(letter) in range(65,91):
print(letter),
--
That isn't in the published 2.5 License.
http://docs.python.org/dev/ref/node110.html
Thanks for the scare..
~r
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.
On 2006-04-01, Piet van Oostrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (F) wrote:
>
>>F> Can I ask for clarification. The charge applies to any commercial use
>>F> of a derivative work based on the Python source code ?
>
>>F> Normal applications that use Python, including
On 2006-04-01, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
Good one Steve
Look at the date.
Worry about this if it is still around tomarrow
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Aww, but I liked the idea of copying Perl 6 REs, and porting python to
> the toy CPU :-)
I think if PSF is going to support porting of Python to "toy" CPUs then
the Digi-Comp should be the first target. This will breathe new life
into these toys which for years have be
Ivan Herman>I would certainly look at *all details* of the
announcement,<
Aww, but I liked the idea of copying Perl 6 REs, and porting python to
the toy CPU :-)
(But making strings mutable sounds too much strange).
Bye and thank you,
bearophile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
I would certainly look at *all details* of the announcement, including
the second line from the top which gives the date:-)
Ivan
Caleb Hattingh wrote:
> WAIT-
>
> Did I just get caught by an April Fools Joke?
>
> I have a nasty feeling about this :))
>
> C
>
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
> "Fuzzyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (F) wrote:
>F> Can I ask for clarification. The charge applies to any commercial use
>F> of a derivative work based on the Python source code ?
>F> Normal applications that use Python, including bunding the standard
>F> CPython as an executable, using tools li
WAIT-
Did I just get caught by an April Fools Joke?
I have a nasty feeling about this :))
C
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Steve
I agree with you. If my vote means anything, I vote against it.
>> The Board realises that this change will be
>> contentious. There are many advantages
>> to making it, however, which we feel will
>> benefit the Python community at large
>> and the PSF membership in particular.
>> Users w
Fuzzyman wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
> > As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> > recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
> >
> >http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
> >
> > I would like to
Steve Holden wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
> I would like to place on record my protest aga
Steve Holden wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I must saay that i am fully in favor of this cha
Steve Holden wrote:
> As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
> recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
>
>http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
>
> I would like to place on record my protest aga
I say good riddence. Python's success has always been on its merits as
an open source application platform. Corprate usage has always been
relatively insignificant, and I suspect that many companies are
overrepresenting the level of dependance they have on python in an
attempt to steer their compet
As the only director of the Python Software Foundation to vote against a
recent Board motion to implement the change in licensing terms described in
http://pyfound.blogspot.com/2006/04/python-25-licensing-change.html
I would like to place on record my protest against this change. I think
it
34 matches
Mail list logo
