In article
,
Steve Howe wrote:
> The whole point is, is not supposed to be a set; a set literal would
> end with "})". As you can see, there is no such construct in the
> string.
> It's just a dict inside parentheses. Somehow, the parser seems to
> think it's a set.
>>> type({'', 1})
>>> type(
Geremy and the parser are correct - it *is* a set. It would only be a
dict if you changed the comma to a colon.
regards
Steve
On 10/24/2010 1:31 AM, Steve Howe wrote:
> Hello Geremy,
>
> The whole point is, is not supposed to be a set; a set literal would
> end with "})". As you can see, there
Ok, forget, I found the problem: bad sleeping.
Thanks.
--
Howe
howest...@gmail.com
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Steve Howe wrote:
> Hello Geremy,
>
> The whole point is, is not supposed to be a set; a set literal would
> end with "})". As you can see, there is no such construct in the
> st
Hello Geremy,
The whole point is, is not supposed to be a set; a set literal would
end with "})". As you can see, there is no such construct in the
string.
It's just a dict inside parentheses. Somehow, the parser seems to
think it's a set.
--
Howe
howest...@gmail.com
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Steve Howe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This looks like a parser bug, but it's so basic I'm in doubt. Can
> anyone confirm ?
>
import sys
sys.version
> '2.7.0+ (r27:82500, Sep 15 2010, 18:14:55) \n[GCC 4.4.5]'
({'', 1}.items())
> Traceback (most recent call l
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Steve Howe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This looks like a parser bug, but it's so basic I'm in doubt. Can
> anyone confirm ?
>
import sys
sys.version
> '2.7.0+ (r27:82500, Sep 15 2010, 18:14:55) \n[GCC 4.4.5]'
({'', 1}.items())
> Traceback (most recent call
Hello,
This looks like a parser bug, but it's so basic I'm in doubt. Can
anyone confirm ?
>>> import sys
>>> sys.version
'2.7.0+ (r27:82500, Sep 15 2010, 18:14:55) \n[GCC 4.4.5]'
>>> ({'', 1}.items())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
AttributeError: 'set' object has no at
