Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > I guess I answered my own question and it looks like it wouldn’t matter if > you did it opposite from weeks to seconds. Yep, you've got it! Remember, you can always try things out in the interactive interpreter to see what's happening. H

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-09 Thread Chris Angelico
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > How to do it from the small end up: > > time = int(raw_input("Enter number of seconds: ")) > seconds = time % 60 > > So here it takes say 100 and divides it by 60 to put in seconds and > spits out the remainder? 100 / 60 is approxi

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-09 Thread Scott W Dunning
On Feb 8, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: OH, I think I figured it out. > time = int(raw_input("Enter number of seconds: “)) 100 > seconds = time % 60 Remainder of 40 <- for seconds. > time /= 60 Here you take 100/60 = 1 (which = time for the next line). > minutes = time %

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-09 Thread Scott W Dunning
On Feb 8, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: I have one more question on this if you don’t mind. I’m a bit confused on how it works this way without it being in seconds? I’ll answer below each step of how it seems to work to me. > How to do it from the small end up: > > time = int(ra

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Larry Hudson
On 02/08/2014 05:21 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: I figured it out! Thanks Chris! Taking it one step at a time with the five digit number really helped me to see how to break it all up! Are you a teacher? I appreciate the help and the patients! I like that you don’t just give me the answer t

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > > That's certainly effective. It's going to give you the right result. I > would be inclined to start from the small end and strip off the > seconds first, then the minutes, etc, because t

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Scott W Dunning
On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > That's certainly effective. It's going to give you the right result. I > would be inclined to start from the small end and strip off the > seconds first, then the minutes, etc, because then you're working with > smaller divisors (60, 60, 24, 7 i

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > > I had no idea > that, in a group of half a dozen nerds, nobody would recognize this > broken text: "In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil .. > sight / Let worship

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Scott W Dunning
On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > No, I'm not a teacher by profession, but I was homeschooled, and since > I'm the second of seven children [1], I got used to teaching things to > my siblings. Also, every week I run a Dungeons and Dragons campaign > online, which requires simila

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Scott W Dunning
On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:29 PM, Chris Angelico wrote > Close! But if you print out foo and bar, you'll see that you're naming > them backwards in the second one. The last digit is the remainder > (modulo), the rest is the quotient. So, this is more like what you’re talking about? >>> first = numbe

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Scott W Dunning
I figured it out! Thanks Chris! Taking it one step at a time with the five digit number really helped me to see how to break it all up! Are you a teacher? I appreciate the help and the patients! I like that you don’t just give me the answer that you break it down and help me so that I can f

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > On Feb 8, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> Carry on with that method - work out the number of minutes, and then >> the "hours_etc" which has the rest. Then do the same to split off >> hours, and then days. See how you go! > >

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Scott W Dunning
On Feb 8, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > > Carry on with that method - work out the number of minutes, and then > the "hours_etc" which has the rest. Then do the same to split off > hours, and then days. See how you go! I did it similar to that but I went backwards. I started with n

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > I figured it out! Thanks Chris! Taking it one step at a time with the five > digit number really helped me to see how to break it all up! Are you a > teacher? I appreciate the help and the patients! I like that you don’t just > give

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-08 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > So, this is more like what you’re talking about? > first = number / 10 second = number % 10 last = first %10 rest = second / 10 > > I feel stupid saying this and it’s probably because of the variables I’m > using but I’

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > Ok, so it this what you’re talking about? > > > number = int(raw_input(“Enter a five digit number:)) > foo = number % 10 > bar = number / 10 > > digit = foo / 10 > rem = bar % 10 > Close! But if you print out foo and bar, you'll see that yo

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Scott W Dunning
> > On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:10 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> number = int(raw_input("Enter a five-digit number: ")) >> >> Now we begin to split it up: >> >> foo = number % 10 >> bar = number / 10 >> Ok, so it this what you’re talking about? number = int(raw_input(“Enter a five digit number:

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:10 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > > > You should be able to get this to the point of writing out five > separate values, which are the original five digits. Each one is worth > 10 of the previous value. At every step, do

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Scott W Dunning
On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:10 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > > You should be able to get this to the point of writing out five > separate values, which are the original five digits. Each one is worth > 10 of the previous value. At every step, do both halves of the > division. What do you mean by at ea

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > So, if I use the five digit # 5, bar = 5000, and foo = 0 because there > is no remainder after dividing by 10? Does it make a difference weather foo > or bar are written first? That's correct. It'll be more visible if you use a five-di

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Rustom Mody
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 10:35:49 AM UTC+5:30, Rustom Mody wrote: > On Saturday, February 8, 2014 10:14:10 AM UTC+5:30, Scott W Dunning wrote: > > > I have a question that was a part of my homework and I got it correct but > > the teacher urged me to do it using the % sign rather than subtra

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Scott W Dunning
On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:10 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > It might be easiest to think in terms of a single "divide into > quotient and remainder" operation. Let's leave aside > weeks/days/hours/minutes/seconds and split a number up into its > digits. (This is actually not as useless as you might thi

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Asaf Las
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 7:05:49 AM UTC+2, Rustom Mody wrote: > On Saturday, February 8, 2014 10:14:10 AM UTC+5:30, Scott W Dunning wrote: > > > I have a question that was a part of my homework > > and I got it correct but the teacher urged me to do it using the > > % sign rather than subtr

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > I have a question that was a part of my homework and I got it correct but > the teacher urged me to do it using the % sign rather than subtracting > everything, for some reason I’m having issues getting it to calculate > correctly. Oh by th

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Scott W Dunning wrote: > - This is what I’ve been working with. I get the correct answers for > minutes and seconds then it goes to shit after that. > > seconds = raw_input("Enter the number of seconds:") > seconds = int(seconds) > minutes = seconds/60 > seconds =

Re: Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Rustom Mody
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 10:14:10 AM UTC+5:30, Scott W Dunning wrote: > I have a question that was a part of my homework and I got it correct but the > teacher urged me to do it using the % sign rather than subtracting > everything, for some reason I'm having issues getting it to calculate

Python 2.7.6 help with modules

2014-02-07 Thread Scott W Dunning
I have a question that was a part of my homework and I got it correct but the teacher urged me to do it using the % sign rather than subtracting everything, for some reason I’m having issues getting it to calculate correctly. I’ll put the question below, and what I originally had and below that