On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info
wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2014 14:58:05 -0500, Larry Martell wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid
wrote:
Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com writes:
Somthing I came across in my
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 28.05.2014 21:23, Larry Martell wrote:
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
Sub-headline The Python community should fork Python 2. Which could
also read Someone else should REALLY fork Py2 because I'm mad about Py3
yet
I agree that Py3 made a grave error in breaking backward-compatibility.
However, that's the reality and the transition will take place over
time, possibly even before IPv6 overtakes IPv4 in popularity.
But then, I was never really beholden to third-party libraries and
frameworks. Instead, the
Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com writes:
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
[1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
Python 3 can revive Python https://medium.com/p/2a7af4788b10
long HN comment thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7801834
Python
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid wrote:
Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com writes:
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
[1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
Python 3 can revive Python https://medium.com/p/2a7af4788b10
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com wrote:
No company that I work for is using python 3 - they just have too much of an
investment in a python 2 code base to switch. I'm just saying.
And that's not a problem. Every whinging blog author seems to forget
that
On 28/05/2014 20:58, Larry Martell wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid
mailto:no.email@nospam.invalid wrote:
Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com
mailto:larry.mart...@gmail.com writes:
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com writes:
No company that I work for is using python 3 - they just have too much
of an investment in a python 2 code base to switch.
There are many large companies still using FORTRAN and COBOL because of
a large investment in those languages, which are far
Ben Finney b...@benfinney.id.au writes:
There are many large companies still using FORTRAN and COBOL because of
a large investment in those languages, which are far more outdated than
Python 2. What's your point?
I think some of us see Python 2 as perfectly fine--we've looked into
Python 3 and
On 5/28/2014 3:23 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
Claim: Python 3 languishes in disuse.
Fact: in 2013, there were around 14 million downloads of windows
installers for each of 2.7.x and 3.3.x.
On 5/28/2014 3:49 PM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com writes:
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
[1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
Python 3 can revive Python https://medium.com/p/2a7af4788b10
This makes the same false claim
On Wed, 28 May 2014 14:58:05 -0500, Larry Martell wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin no.email@nospam.invalid
wrote:
Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com writes:
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
[1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
Terry Reedy, 29.05.2014 02:41:
On 5/28/2014 3:23 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
Claim: Python 3 languishes in disuse.
Fact: in 2013, there were around 14 million downloads of windows
On Wed, 28 May 2014 20:41:53 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
Claim: Another great strength of Python 2 was that programs written in
it would almost always run on the next version of Python without much
alteration.
True.
True, but only because of the weasel-words almost always, and without
much
Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info writes:
The Python core developers have recent committed to providing security
updates for 2.7 until 2020. And Redhat have paid support for 2.7 until
2023. So there's no rush.
Perhaps Python 4 will be out by then and the Python 2 holdouts can skip
over
301 - 316 of 316 matches
Mail list logo