Thanks a lot for all the responses. I'll move back to Python 2.5 for
compatibility with SciPY and some other third party packages.
I'll leave the compilation process for some other day, for now I'm a
happy user, mayve In the future I would like to contribute to the
developmental process..
--
I just recently learned python, I'm using it mainly to process huge
5GB txt files of ASCII information about DNA. I've decided to learn
3.0, but maybe I need to step back to 2.6?
I'm getting exceedingly frustrated by the slow file IO behaviour of
python 3.0. I know that a bug-report was submitted
thomasvang...@gmail.com wrote:
C:\python30 patch -p0 fileio_buffer.patch
The patch command is not recognized..
You need the 'patch' program first. Further, you will need a C compiler. If
you don't know how to compile from sources, I would postpone patching
sources to after learning that.
thomasvang...@gmail.com schrieb:
I just recently learned python, I'm using it mainly to process huge
5GB txt files of ASCII information about DNA. I've decided to learn
3.0, but maybe I need to step back to 2.6?
I'm getting exceedingly frustrated by the slow file IO behaviour of
python 3.0.
Quoth Christian Heimes li...@cheimes.de:
thomasvang...@gmail.com schrieb:
I just recently learned python, I'm using it mainly to process huge
5GB txt files of ASCII information about DNA. I've decided to learn
3.0, but maybe I need to step back to 2.6?
I'm getting exceedingly
