Trolls?
On 4/19/05, Fredrik Lundh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
could ildg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Private stuff always makes programming much easier.
says who?
/F
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 4/19/05, could ildg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Python is an oop language,
Yes.
Private stuff always makes programming much easier.
That contention is, at best, debatable. See
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/b977ed1312e10b21.
--
Cheers,
Simon B,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Simon Brunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/05, could ildg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Python is an oop language,
Yes.
Private stuff always makes programming much easier.
That contention is, at best, debatable. See
Roy Smith wrote:
Simon Brunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/05, could ildg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Private stuff always makes programming much easier.
That contention is, at best, debatable. See
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/msg/b977ed1312e10b21.
Nice essay. Now, for
Have I missed something? Doesn't this mangle class methods:
class Foo:
def __bar(self):
print bar
Granted, you could probably figure out how the names are being
mangled. In the example above __bar is a defacto private method.
Griping about it not having `private' in front of it is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roy Smith wrote:
Simon Brunning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/05, could ildg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Private stuff always makes programming much easier.
That contention is, at best, debatable. See
but why does it hava not private methods?
Because it does not need them, ain't it?
Private stuff always makes programming much easier.
Does it? Sometimes contortion is needed to get rid of declarations
that restrain access, for example, when writing tests.
I think the point-of-view of Python is
201 - 207 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
