Éric Daigneault wrote:
> This being said after a bit of experience in programming, design
> patterns and other marvels of the modern brains, doing bad code in
> python requires a conscious effort to do. The bright side is that it
> gives all the justification to reviewers to smack the offend
"Chris Brat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that one of the
> advantages of Python is that code can be developed x times faster than
> languages such as <>.
>
> Does anyone have any comments on that statement from personal
> experience?
Wel
Just a little something I realized after writing the same program in
C++ and python (a simple chat client and server, with one on one and
chat room capabilities). I used wxwidgets and wxpython respectively
for the GUIs, and they weren't extremely elaborate, just some basic
functionality, a few fra
"Chris Brat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that one of the
> advantages of Python is that code can be developed x times faster than
> languages such as <>.
>
> Does anyone have any comments on that statement from personal
> experience?
> How
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 18:34 +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Honestly, how many important Python modules do still run on 2.2?
InformixDB still compiles on 2.2 except when I accidentally temporarily
break backwards compatibility.
Of course it's a matter of opinion whether it qualifies as an important
Diez B. Roggisch wrote
> I wouldn't consider jython abandonware. It is under active development, and
> I'm using a 2.2 alpha successful for quite a while now - which usually
> serves my needs.
>
> The problem is/was that new-style classes were a major hurdle to take, and
> this now seems to be con
One thing I really like, is making "prototypes" on python.
Just to test some algorithm or procedure.
It is very fast and easy to debug.
So after, I make it in c++ (but not too much often, I leave it in
python today.)
Chris Brat wrote:
> I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that
Chris Brat schrieb:
> I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that one of the
> advantages of Python is that code can be developed x times faster than
> languages such as <>.
>
> Does anyone have any comments on that statement from personal
> experience?
> How is this comparison mea
> Oh, the memories... I went down the same road about two years ago,
> though I didn't know about PyLucene at the time and wrapped in jython
> the parts of Lucene I used... never bothered to deal with java's
> verbosity after that. It's a pity that jython resembles abandon-ware
> these days, when j
Steven Bethard wrote:
> A simple example from document indexing. Using Java Lucene to index
> some documents, you'd write code something like::
>
> Analyzer analyzer = new StandardAnalyzer()
> IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(store_dir, analyzer, true)
> for (Value value: value
Chris Brat wrote:
> I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that one of the
> advantages of Python is that code can be developed x times faster than
> languages such as <>.
>
> Does anyone have any comments on that statement from personal
> experience?
I had to work at a laborator
"Chris Brat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that one of the
> advantages of Python is that code can be developed x times faster than
> languages such as <>.
>
> Does anyone have any comments on that statement from personal
> experience?
> How
I work full time with Java, but downloaded python about a year ago and
started playing.
I've used it quite a few times in my working environment.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Chris Brat wrote:
> I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that one of the
> advantages of Python is that code can be developed x times faster than
> languages such as <>.
>
> Does anyone have any comments on that statement from personal
> experience?
> How is this comparison mea
Chris Brat wrote:
> I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that one of the
> advantages of Python is that code can be developed x times faster than
> languages such as <>.
>
> Does anyone have any comments on that statement from personal
> experience?
have you tried writing somet
I've seen a few posts, columns and articles which state that one of the
advantages of Python is that code can be developed x times faster than
languages such as <>.
Does anyone have any comments on that statement from personal
experience?
How is this comparison measured?
Thanks
Chris
--
http:/
16 matches
Mail list logo
