On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:37 AM, James Jong wrote:
> Thanks so much Chris. This is part of a super computer and I am afraid I
> don't have access to a machine with sudo permissions and similar
> architecture & OS.
Do you know what the OS is, at least? Can you, for instance, create a
virtual mach
Thanks so much Chris. This is part of a super computer and I am afraid I
don't have access to a machine with sudo permissions and similar
architecture & OS.
Is there any way to active higher level of verbosity during the build
process to identify what is failing? Or anything specifically I should
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:39 AM, James Jong wrote:
> I managed to compile sqlite with:
>
> CPPFLAGS='-I/path_to_sqlite-3.7.16.2/include -I/path_to_tk8.6.0/include'
>
> DFLAGS='-L/path_to_sqlite-3.7.16.2/lib -L/path_to_tk8.6.0/lib/'
>
> ./configure --prefix=/path_to_python-2.7.4 --enable-shared
>
>
I managed to compile sqlite with:
CPPFLAGS='-I/path_to_sqlite-3.7.16.2/include -I/path_to_tk8.6.0/include'
DFLAGS='-L/path_to_sqlite-3.7.16.2/lib -L/path_to_tk8.6.0/lib/'
./configure --prefix=/path_to_python-2.7.4 --enable-shared
However, _tkinter is still failing. I don't know what else to try.
Thank you Terry, I am working with:
> cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.18-274.el5xen (brewbuil...@norob.fnal.gov) (gcc version
4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-50)) #1 SMP Thu Jul 21
> cat /etc/redhat-release
Scientific Linux SL release 5.1 (Boron)
I did not find distribution-specific tar balls f
On 4/16/2013 10:30 AM, rosoloum wrote:
I do not have admin rights on my machine
The answer to your question may depend on the OS (linux), distribution
(many), and version.
What about `_tkinter` and `dl`? How can I have them ready for the Python
installer?
Building _tkinter (a Python C-co
Note: I left a copy of this thread
<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16026348/preparing-sqlite-dl-and-tkinter-for-python-installation-no-admin-rights>
on StackOverflow:.
--
View this message in context:
http://python.6.x6.nabble.com/Preparing-sqlite-dl-and-tkinter-for-Python-installation-no-admin-ri
Solved.
I had to remove environment variable TCL_LIBRARY, which pointed to some
non-existent installation.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I need help of those who familiar with Python-Tcl/tk bundle.
I cannot start IDLE IDE for Python 3.2.3 or 3.3.0 installation. Command
python -m idlelib.idle
gives next output:
C:\Python33>python -m idlelib.idle
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:\Python33\lib\runpy.py", line 160,
On Feb 27, 10:14 pm, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> On 28 Feb, 01:48, gujax wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system for over two
> > years - gave up for a while and now I am back with a resolve to solve
> > the problem. I tried all versions of python but having in
On Feb 28, 12:51 am, gujax wrote:
> I agree with you. I have a CD of Xubuntu. I tried
> booting up with the CD and was impressed. I noticed
> few problems with screen resolution, window size etc.
Though it may be worth working out any niggling problems to switch to
Linux, I don't think you should
On Feb 27, 9:56 pm, staticd wrote:
> On Feb 27, 8:48 pm, gujax wrote:
>
> > I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system for over two
> > years - gave up for a while and now I am back with a resolve to solve
> > the problem.
>
> Dude. Give up. There are a ton of __free__ distroz of
On Feb 27, 9:36 pm, Rick Dooling wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system
>
> Try this:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/w7wgp
>
> RD
I gave it a shot but the site installs the same version of
ActivePython which did install on my computer but does not open any
command win
On 28 Feb, 01:48, gujax wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system for over two
> years - gave up for a while and now I am back with a resolve to solve
> the problem. I tried all versions of python but having installation
> problems for all. Installation does not proce
On Feb 27, 8:48 pm, gujax wrote:
> I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system for over two
> years - gave up for a while and now I am back with a resolve to solve
> the problem.
Dude. Give up. There are a ton of __free__ distroz of linux out
there. Your troubles are not worth th
Rick Dooling wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system
>
> Try this:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/w7wgp
>
That explains how to install Python on Windows *XP*. Windows ME is no
longer a supported platform - the tools used to create it just aren't
able to support platform
> Hi,
> I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system
Try this:
http://tinyurl.com/w7wgp
RD
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>> I do not even
>> know what to do next. I also tried Activepython. It installs but when
>> I try to open it from Start->Programs->ActivePython 2.6, I get an
>> error window saying - upgrade windows.
>
> Hmm, have you tried "upgrading windows, just a wild guess!
Hey, not everyone can afford to u
On Feb 27, 7:48 pm, gujax wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system for over two
> years -
Wow 2 years!, you must have the patience of a saint!
> Installation does not proceed and I get a message
> saying "dll required for installation could not be run".
Did it say
Hi,
I have been trying to install python on my Win ME system for over two
years - gave up for a while and now I am back with a resolve to solve
the problem. I tried all versions of python but having installation
problems for all. Installation does not proceed and I get a message
saying "dll require
On 12/20/2009 1:35 AM, Stef Mientki wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
Stef Mientki wrote:
hello,
I just upgraded from Python 2.5 to 2.6.
Most of the things work,
but I'm struggling with one issue,
when I start Python in a command window,
it still uses Python 2.5.
Is there a way to get Python 2.6 as
Steve Holden wrote:
Stef Mientki wrote:
hello,
I just upgraded from Python 2.5 to 2.6.
Most of the things work,
but I'm struggling with one issue,
when I start Python in a command window,
it still uses Python 2.5.
Is there a way to get Python 2.6 as my default Python environment ?
thanks,
Stef Mientki wrote:
> hello,
>
> I just upgraded from Python 2.5 to 2.6.
> Most of the things work,
> but I'm struggling with one issue,
> when I start Python in a command window,
> it still uses Python 2.5.
>
> Is there a way to get Python 2.6 as my default Python environment ?
>
> thanks,
> St
hello,
I just upgraded from Python 2.5 to 2.6.
Most of the things work,
but I'm struggling with one issue,
when I start Python in a command window,
it still uses Python 2.5.
Is there a way to get Python 2.6 as my default Python environment ?
thanks,
Stef Mientki
--
http://mail.python.org/mailma
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Vo, Trinh (388C) wrote:
> Hello Python Users,
>
>
>
> I am new to Python. I have errors message when I installed Python. I
> appreciate if you can help.
>
>
>
> I download Python-2.6-2. I then did the following steps:
>
> ./configure
>
> make
>
>
>
> In the secon
Hello Python Users,
I am new to Python. I have errors message when I installed Python. I
appreciate if you can help.
I download Python-2.6-2. I then did the following steps:
./configure
make
In the second step "make", I had the following message:
Failed to find the necessary bits to build
In message , Geoff
Gardiner wrote:
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> .. I expect an apology.
>> Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an abuse complaint to your ISP.
>>
> Yes, I do apologize profusely and publicly ...
Thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> .. I expect an apology.
> Otherwise, it becomes grounds for an abuse complaint to your ISP.
>
Yes, I do apologize profusely and publicly, and would have done so
regardless of threat.
I had trouble with posts making it through to the list and so was also
posting in
In message , Geoff
Gardiner wrote:
> @Lawrence D'Oliveiro:
> ...
I see that you published my unobfuscated e-mail address on USENET for all to
see. I obfuscated it for a reason, to keep the spammers away. I'm assuming
this was a momentary lapse of judgement, for which I expect an apology.
Othe
Aahz wrote:
> ... That seems to demonstrate that regrtest.py is indeed a good mechanism for
> finding out whether it's a b0rked install!
>
I agree that regrtest.py looks a good mechanism. It just appears that
`apt-get install python` on Debian and Ubuntu brings no tests with it.
@Lawrence D'Ol
In article ,
Geoff Gardiner wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>>
>> What directory are you running this from? What happens if you switch to
>> running "python Lib/test/regrtest.py"? Taking a closer look, this looks
>> more like a plain import error.
>
>I couldn't do quite that because there's no Lib, but in
In message , Geoff
Gardiner wrote:
> How do I assure myself of the integrity of a Python installation
> acquired using apt-get install on Debian and Ubuntu?
apt-get install debsums
man debsums
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Aahz wrote:
>
> What directory are you running this from? What happens if you switch to
> running "python Lib/test/regrtest.py"? Taking a closer look, this looks
> more like a plain import error.
>
Thank you for your suggestion.
I couldn't do quite that because there's no Lib, but inste
In article ,
Geoff Gardiner wrote:
>
>geg...@gegard:~$ python
>Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
>[GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)] on linux2
>Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
from test import regrtest
regrtest.main()
>test_grammar
Aahz wrote:
> How important is the apt-get requirement?
That's a significant point, thank you. Two parts to the response:
a) I don't feel that I am sufficiently expert to launch into compilation
of Python if I can avoid it.
b) I hope that I can put all platform risk into the lap of the hosting
In article ,
Geoff Gardiner wrote:
>
>How do I assure myself of the integrity of a Python installation
>acquired using apt-get install on Debian and Ubuntu?
How important is the apt-get requirement? Building Python yourself in
this situation sounds like it would be simpler/safer.
--
How do I assure myself of the integrity of a Python installation
acquired using apt-get install on Debian and Ubuntu?
I can run regrtest but there's nothing in the basic installation to run,
viz.:
geg...@gegard:~$ python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 31 2008, 17:28:52)
[GCC 4.2.3 (Ubuntu
Evan> ... 've tried to install from source, and I've tried to install
Evan> with apt-get, but no matter which method I use, my installation is
Evan> crippled. When I try to install Python 2.6.2 or 2.6.1, the
Evan> installer warns me that it has failed to install zlib and
Evan
I'm not one to overreact, but I've got a serious problem with my Python
installation. I've tried to install from source, and I've tried to install
with apt-get, but no matter which method I use, my installation is crippled.
When I try to install Python 2.6.2 or 2.6.1, the ins
Hi
Thank you for the suggestions, I will see what I can from here.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:07:24 -0700 (PDT), kk wrote:
> I know there is a way to import from different Python installation but
> I could not find the answer. I have Python 2.6 and 2.5
You can probably achieve this by adjusting the pythonpath to
search through the site-packages directory
kk wrote:
Hi
I know there is a way to import from different Python installation but
I could not find the answer. I have Python 2.6 and 2.5
thanks
There's always the question of whether it's a good idea. My opinion is
that if you want to use python source files from another ve
Hi
I know there is a way to import from different Python installation but
I could not find the answer. I have Python 2.6 and 2.5
thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Ahmed Majeed wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working over a research project and need Python 2.3 or later to
> be installed on my Intel Centrino machine, running Fedora 9 as OS. I
> have downloaded latest stable release Python 2.6.1 from Python.org,
> but when I tried install
Ahmed Majeed schrieb:
Hi,
I am working over a research project and need Python 2.3 or later to
be installed on my Intel Centrino machine, running Fedora 9 as OS. I
have downloaded latest stable release Python 2.6.1 from Python.org,
but when I tried installing it, terminal returned an error on 'ma
Hi,
I am working over a research project and need Python 2.3 or later to
be installed on my Intel Centrino machine, running Fedora 9 as OS. I
have downloaded latest stable release Python 2.6.1 from Python.org,
but when I tried installing it, terminal returned an error on 'make',
saying:
"Failed to
Mchizi_Crazy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please help with issue...
What is the issue? What have you tried, what is happening, and what
behaviour were you expecting instead?
> I heard of compatimbiltity issues and would like clarification.
Same here. Can you please clarify what the issue is, a
On Sep 9, 3:46 pm, Mchizi_Crazy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please help with issue... I heard of compatimbiltity issues and would
> like clarification.
The win32 installer available from python.org works absolutely fine
with Vista. So, go ahead and try it out. It works for all of my
friends and m
I don't use it often in Vista, but I haven't had any issues. Matter-of-
fact, some things seem nicer in Vista... for instance it resets IDLE
whenever I rerun a module.
Mchizi_Crazy wrote:
> Please help with issue... I heard of compatimbiltity issues and would
> like clarification.
--
http://mail.p
Please help with issue... I heard of compatimbiltity issues and would
like clarification.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I built and installed Python 2.4 on 12/12/2007. Recently, I tried
installing python-ldap-2.3.4. The error I received was:
error: invalid Python installation: unable to open
/usr/local/openSource/architectureIndependent:/usr/local/openSource/IRIX
6/lib/python2.4/config/Makefile (No such file or
My RHEL yum package-manager comes with Python-2.4.3. We also have a
seperate Python-2.4.4 Installation on our box.
When I added Tkinter using 'yum install tkinter' it seems to have added it
in a manner that it is exclusively visible to Python-2.4.3. I cannot import
Tkinter from Python-2.4.4.
'import _tkinter' fails on my system. I wanted to enable tk support. I do
have tk and tk-devel installed (but they weren't around when we installed
python). What's the best way to get these modules into python? I hope I do
not have to reinstall python itself? Or do I?
--
Rahul
--
http://mail.
On 21 Mai, 12:07, Thomas Troeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'd like to put the python library and interpreter on a small embedded
> Linux x86 compatible device where disk space is an issue. I played
> around with the minimal Python interpreters, but was not entirely happy
> with them, so my qu
Hi,
I'd like to put the python library and interpreter on a small embedded
Linux x86 compatible device where disk space is an issue. I played
around with the minimal Python interpreters, but was not entirely happy
with them, so my question is, is there an (preferably easy) way to put
the inte
On Mar 9, 11:42 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I downloaded a pre-compiled version 2.5, and intalled it without any
> error message; and I can command line playing on Python through firing
> up IDLE or command-line. However, I just can't compile the python file
> existing in a directo
Hi Folks,
I downloaded a pre-compiled version 2.5, and intalled it without any
error message; and I can command line playing on Python through firing
up IDLE or command-line. However, I just can't compile the python file
existing in a directory. Today, I tried to fire Python in a DOS
window, then
On Apr 3, 6:26 am, "Kushal Kumaran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 3, 9:33 am, "ZMY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
>
> > I am installing python 2.2 on QNX4.25 but can't get it into /usr/local/
> > bin/ directory. Here is what I did:
>
> > 1) untar Python-2.2 into directory /open
On Apr 3, 9:33 am, "ZMY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am installing python 2.2 on QNX4.25 but can't get it into /usr/local/
> bin/ directory. Here is what I did:
>
> 1) untar Python-2.2 into directory /openqnx/Python-2.2/
>
> 2) use command:
> CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash CC=c
Hi all,
I am installing python 2.2 on QNX4.25 but can't get it into /usr/local/
bin/ directory. Here is what I did:
1) untar Python-2.2 into directory /openqnx/Python-2.2/
2) use command:
CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash CC=cc RANLIB=:
./configure --verbose --without-gcc --with-libm=""
I've been trying to install Mailman, which requires a newer version
of the Python language compiler (p-code generator?) than the one I
currently have on my linux webserver/gateway box.
It's running a ClarkConnect 2.01 package based on Red Hat 7.2 linux.
I downloaded the zipped tarball (Python-
On 1 mar, 06:22, Ray Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to install Mailman, which requires a newer version
> of the Python language compiler (p-code generator?)
It's actually the whole thing : (byte-code) compiler, virtual machine,
and stdlib.
> than the one I
> currently have on
I've been trying to install Mailman, which requires a newer version
of the Python language compiler (p-code generator?) than the one I
currently have on my linux webserver/gateway box.
It's running a ClarkConnect 2.01 package based on Red Hat 7.2 linux.
I downloaded the zipped tarball (Python-2
Does not help my immediate situation, but this understanding definitely
helps.
Thanks
/J
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> j_nwb schrieb:
>>I have multiple python installations. 2.2, 2.3, 2.4. When I install a
>> new package (pygtk2) , it always install in python 2.3.
>>I changed the /usr/bin/pyth
j_nwb schrieb:
>I have multiple python installations. 2.2, 2.3, 2.4. When I install a
> new package (pygtk2) , it always install in python 2.3.
>I changed the /usr/bin/python to be 2.4 binary. Still the same behavior.
>How does rpms, determine which installation to update ? Is there a
>
HI
I have multiple python installations. 2.2, 2.3, 2.4. When I install a
new package (pygtk2) , it always install in python 2.3.
I changed the /usr/bin/python to be 2.4 binary. Still the same behavior.
How does rpms, determine which installation to update ? Is there a
file somewhere ?
I a
Ravi Teja wrote:
> Python has zip imports (similar to Java's jar files). You can put all
> your *.py files in a zip file and access them from it if this means so
> much to you.
Python also supports "frozen" modules, where the module bytecode is
linked into a Python interpreter as data. by combin
Jack wrote:
> With Python, things are really messy. I have to run the installer
> to install dozens of directories and hundreds of files, and I don't
> really know if all of them are necessary.
PHP has LOTS of functions in a single namespace. I don't know wether
they are in separate files or pack
XBello wrote:
> It's possible to work with php just with these single file? Maybe I'm
> doing the wrong thing, because to start to program I needed to install
> a web server too (a large bunch of files).
PHP can be run from the command line too. On ubuntu/debian it's available
by installing the
No! mod_python needs Python. It is simply an integration module for
Apache and Python, not an interpreter.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
It's possible to work with php just with these single file? Maybe I'm
doing the wrong thing, because to start to program I needed to install
a web server too (a large bunch of files). Also I've been looking into
http://www.modpython.org/, which appears to be a modular kind of python
with less than
Carl Banks wrote:
> G. Monzón wrote:
> > Please don't compare PHP with Python... They are very different worlds.
>
> I'm not. I was simply agreeing that the single executable way the OP
> claimed PHP does it can *sometimes* be preferrable in Python, and
> giving him recommendations thereto.
>
> C
Addendum:
Python has zip imports (similar to Java's jar files). You can put all
your *.py files in a zip file and access them from it if this means so
much to you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
PHP and Python are different languages. They do things differently. You
are just familiar more with one than the other. Give it some time.
The many file approach is the modular design of Python. Having the
standard library separate from the main Python DLL is an advantage, not
a disadvantage. For
G. Monzón wrote:
> Please don't compare PHP with Python... They are very different worlds.
I'm not. I was simply agreeing that the single executable way the OP
claimed PHP does it can *sometimes* be preferrable in Python, and
giving him recommendations thereto.
Carl Banks
--
http://mail.pyth
Please don't compare PHP with Python... They are very different worlds.
Maybe not all the Python's core functions are implemented in C, but
Python is really a lot more efficient than PHP in every case you want
to compare.
If you "look inside", there's nothing to compare... they are extremely
diff
Jack wrote:
> Then again, I do like the Python language. It would be great if
> Python (or a variation of Python) can be made the PHP way, one
> executable file, and you get everything.
True, sometimes it can be a real convenience to have this. There are
solutions that implement your solution to
> With Python, things are really messy. I have to run the installer
> to install dozens of directories and hundreds of files, and I don't
> really know if all of them are necessary. Plus, lots of libraries
> are in .py, which is of course not as efficient/clean as having all
> of the core function
Jack:
>I have to run the installer to install dozens of directories and
>hundreds of files,
That's not unusual and not considered a problem by most people.
>and I don't really know if all of them are necessary.
Don't let that bother you. Life's too short.
>Plus, lots of libraries are in .py,
If this bothers you, why don't you stick to a linux distro with Python
installed.
Very few don't.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I like Python but I don't really like Python's installation.
With PHP, I only need one file (on Linux) and maybe two files
on Windows then I can run my PHP script. This means no installation
is required in most cases. I just copy the file and I get PHP.
Extending PHP is fairly easy, too, just by co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> I'm using OS X 10.4.5. I have an easy problem that I can't solve:
>
> I have two versions of python installed. 2.3 came with the OS and 2.4 I
> installed via fink.
That isn't the "proper" version. While it works, you certainly want the
python 2.4 framework build. Tha
Thanks for the fast responses.>mp
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm using OS X 10.4.5. I have an easy problem that I can't solve:
> I have two versions of python installed. 2.3 came with the OS and 2.4 I
> installed via fink
> 2. How do I uninstall v. 2.3 completely.
Probably not the greatest idea, because pieces of OS X may actu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 1. How do I make both these kinds of calls work with 2.4.
Try "/sw/bin/python foo.py" in the terminal and "#!/sw/bin/python" in
your scripts.
> 2. How do I uninstall v. 2.3 completely.
Don't do that. It will break stuff in the OS that depends on Python.
--
Kevin
I'm using OS X 10.4.5. I have an easy problem that I can't solve:
I have two versions of python installed. 2.3 came with the OS and 2.4 I
installed via fink.
When I call python from the command-line it calls 2.4.
When I just call a *.py file like test.py, it calls 2.3.
1. How do I make both thes
Are you installing with an msi file from a logical drive other than C:?
If so, that's probably the trouble. Copy the msi file to C:\ and try it
from there.
rpd
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[Chris Smith wrote]
> > "mik3" == mik3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> mik3> hi this is a question regarding installing Activestate
> mik3> python whenever i try to install the latest Activestate
> mik3> Python on WinXP SP2, it gives me error saying "The wizard
> mik3> was int
> "mik3" == mik3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mik3> hi this is a question regarding installing Activestate
mik3> python whenever i try to install the latest Activestate
mik3> Python on WinXP SP2, it gives me error saying "The wizard
mik3> was interrupted before Activestate 2.4.
hi
this is a question regarding installing Activestate python
whenever i try to install the latest Activestate Python on WinXP SP2,
it gives me error saying
"The wizard was interrupted before Activestate 2.4.2 could be
completely installed. Your system has not been modified ."
any ideas why thi
Further diggingappears to show this is an instance of the problem documented
here:
http://tinyurl.com/82dt2
Running msiexec with logging revealed the following lines:
MSI (s) (48:F8) [18:15:47:990]: Ignoring disallowed property X
MSI (s) (48:F8) [18:15:47:990]: Ignoring disallowed property TARG
Hi,
I am trying to install python 2.4.1 on a windows XP machine. Whether I
choose to install 'for me' or 'for all users, and no matter where I select
as the root directory, the installer always puts the python root in C:\,
which is obviously a bit messy.
I am running this instalaltion as a sli
Jeremy Jones wrote:
> I guess I'm still having a hard time understanding "what does it
> matter?".
I was under impression that configure embeds the prefix in the build
itself. I was concerned to have to preform the configure/make every time
I change the destination path. It turns out that the
Roel Schroeven wrote:
>Jeremy Jones wrote:
>
>
>
>>Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Is there any way to pass the prefix to the "make install"? Why "make"
>>>depends on that?
>>>
>>>A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>What does it matter? If you *could* pass it to make, what does that buy
>>you? I'm n
Jeremy Jones wrote:
> Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>>
>>Is there any way to pass the prefix to the "make install"? Why "make"
>>depends on that?
>>
>>A.
>>
>
> What does it matter? If you *could* pass it to make, what does that buy
> you? I'm not a make guru, but I'm not sure you can do this. Som
Andy Leszczynski writes:
> Robert Kern wrote:
>> Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>>
>>>Jeremy Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
Andy Leszczynski wrote:
Download the source, untar, cd to the new directory, run:
./configure --prefix=/opt/mypython
make
make install
>>>
>>>Is there any way t
Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>Jeremy Jones wrote:
>
>
>>Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>>
>>Download the source, untar, cd to the new directory, run:
>>
>>./configure --prefix=/opt/mypython
>>make
>>make install
>>
>>
>
>Is there any way to pass the prefix to the "make install"? Why "make"
>depends on
Robert Kern wrote:
> Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>
>>Jeremy Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>>>
>>>Download the source, untar, cd to the new directory, run:
>>>
>>>./configure --prefix=/opt/mypython
>>>make
>>>make install
>>
>>Is there any way to pass the prefix to the "make install"?
>
Andy Leszczynski wrote:
> Jeremy Jones wrote:
>
>>Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>>
>>Download the source, untar, cd to the new directory, run:
>>
>>./configure --prefix=/opt/mypython
>>make
>>make install
>
> Is there any way to pass the prefix to the "make install"?
Is passing it to the configure scr
Jeremy Jones wrote:
> Andy Leszczynski wrote:
>
> Download the source, untar, cd to the new directory, run:
>
> ./configure --prefix=/opt/mypython
> make
> make install
Is there any way to pass the prefix to the "make install"? Why "make"
depends on that?
A.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/
101 - 200 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
