Damn Small Linux could work. If even that won't work, perhaps it's time to
scrap your old fossil for parts and buy a modern computer. Even a netbook would
probably be an improvement based on your situation.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
hexusne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2:04 pm, Thomas Jollans wrote:
On Tuesday 31 August 2010, it occurred to hexusne...@gmail.com to exclaim:
I'm not guessing that this is a problem on Windows 98, but on Windows
ME modules in /Lib don't seem to load. Examples include site.py and
os.py whi
On Aug 31, 2:04 pm, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010, it occurred to hexusne...@gmail.com to exclaim:
>
> > I'm not guessing that this is a problem on Windows 98, but on Windows
> > ME modules in /Lib don't seem to load. Examples include site.py and
> > os.py which are both locat
Thomas Jollans wrote:
I would use another os like Linux or Windows 2000, but this particular
computer can't even seem to handle even the most minimal graphical
Linux distributions.
Really? I'm sure you can get Linux on there somehow. It might not be trivial,
but it should definitely be possib
On Tuesday 31 August 2010, it occurred to hexusne...@gmail.com to exclaim:
> I'm not guessing that this is a problem on Windows 98, but on Windows
> ME modules in /Lib don't seem to load. Examples include site.py and
> os.py which are both located in the top level Lib directory. The same
> thing
I'm not guessing that this is a problem on Windows 98, but on Windows
ME modules in /Lib don't seem to load. Examples include site.py and
os.py which are both located in the top level Lib directory. The same
thing happens with Python 2.3, 2.4, and 2.5. I can't get IDLE to load
and the Python int
