Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, the license text and the copyright notice must be attached. It
doesn't mean that
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Well if it comes so far I have to consult a lawyer I'd rather not publish
it in the first place.
Then take the (free) advice that you asked for.
I'll do that and I appreciate your time in giving it.
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would do that if I were just writing code I thought others could
find usefull. I then would feel no problem burdening those users
with the same kind of license
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would do that if I were just writing code I thought others could
find usefull. I then would feel no problem burdening those users
with the same
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would do that if I were just writing code I thought others could
find usefull. I then
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-14, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would do that if I were just writing code I thought others could
find
Op 2005-04-12, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
What licence can I use? Somewhere they say you can combine python
code with GPL code. Does that mean that the resulting code has
to have both the GPL license as the PSF license, as both seem
to want that derived work
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-12, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
What licence can I use? Somewhere they say you can combine python
code with GPL code. Does that mean that the resulting code has
to have both the GPL license as the PSF license, as both seem
to want
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-12, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
What licence can I use? Somewhere they say you can combine python
code with GPL code. Does that mean that the resulting code has
to have both
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, the license text and the copyright notice must be attached. It
doesn't mean that the PSF license is the operative one for the
derivative work.
Why attach a license that is not operative. That doesn't make sense
to
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, the license text and the copyright notice must be attached. It
doesn't mean that the PSF license is the operative one for the
derivative work.
Why attach
Antoon Pardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see this as my contribution to the communities who has provided me
with all kinds of things that are usefull to me. I'm willing to put
time into this,
Great. My human, non-lawyer advice, if I were to give it, would be
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:30:18 -0400, Terry Reedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antoon Pardon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see this as my contribution to the communities who has provided me
with all kinds of things that are usefull to me. I'm willing to put
time into
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2005-04-13, Robert Kern schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, the license text and the copyright notice must be attached. It
doesn't mean that the PSF license is the operative one for the
derivative
I have made a module derived from the Queue module deliverd
with python 2.3. I would like to make this module (called
tube) available for other people. However it is not clear
to me how I can do this in accordance with the python
license.
First of all it seems I have to make a sumary of how
my
Antoon Pardon wrote:
I have made a module derived from the Queue module deliverd
with python 2.3. I would like to make this module (called
tube) available for other people. However it is not clear
to me how I can do this in accordance with the python
license.
First of all it seems I have to make a
Op 2005-04-12, Steve Holden schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
I have made a module derived from the Queue module deliverd
with python 2.3. I would like to make this module (called
tube) available for other people. However it is not clear
to me how I can do this in accordance
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 09:51, Antoon Pardon wrote:
It seems I have to include the following in
my code:
Copyright (c) 2001, 2002 Python Software Foundation;
All Rights Reserved
Do I understand correctly?
You are of course allowed to *add* your own copyright statement:
Copyright (c)
Antoon Pardon wrote:
What licence can I use? Somewhere they say you can combine python
code with GPL code. Does that mean that the resulting code has
to have both the GPL license as the PSF license, as both seem
to want that derived work uses the same license.
No, the PSF does not want that. It
19 matches
Mail list logo
