ncorrect" (Google, etc).
Any clues on where do look?
Question on stackoverflow
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28538973/pythonmagick-on-windows-dll-load-failed
I see 'cgohlke', who I presume is the C. Gohlke who made the
PythonMagick binary, has already given you h
low.com/questions/28538973/pythonmagick-on-windows-dll-load-failed
--
Julien Levasseur
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 5 Dec 2005 16:38:32 -0800
"Adam Endicott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I actually did some more fiddling around with it, and I
> think I can do what I need with ghostscript, bypassing
> ImageMagick altogether. It also appears to be *much*
> faster.
If you look closer, you will see that this is
+1
Michel Claveau
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I actually did some more fiddling around with it, and I think I can do
what I need with ghostscript, bypassing ImageMagick altogether. It also
appears to be *much* faster.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Adam Endicott wrote:
> Claudio Grondi wrote:
>
>>Why is PIL *(Python Image Library) not suitable to do the graphics?
>>
>>http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
>>
>>Claudio
>
>
> I am using PIL for some other things, but what I need ImageMagick for
> is to convert a PDF into a series of jpegs
I'm not sure I understand. What would be the benefit of GraphicsMagick
over ImageMagick? I looked around the site, and it talks about using
the same PythonMagick, with the same link to procoders.net.
I'm actually using Python 2.3, so any issues with 2.4.2 won't be a
problem.
--
http://mail.pytho
Adam Endicott wrote:
> Claudio Grondi wrote:
>
>>Why is PIL *(Python Image Library) not suitable to do the graphics?
>>
>>http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
>>
>>Claudio
>
>
> I am using PIL for some other things, but what I need ImageMagick for
> is to convert a PDF into a series of jpegs
Adam Endicott wrote:
> Does anyone know anything about PythonMagick? I've got a project that
> could use ImageMagick, so I went looking around for PythonMagick, and
> I'm a bit lost.
>
> I was able to download the PythonMagick source from the ImageMagick
> site, but I'm on Windows and don't have t
Claudio Grondi wrote:
> Why is PIL *(Python Image Library) not suitable to do the graphics?
>
> http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
>
> Claudio
I am using PIL for some other things, but what I need ImageMagick for
is to convert a PDF into a series of jpegs (one per page). Its the only
tool I'v
Adam Endicott wrote:
> Does anyone know anything about PythonMagick? I've got a project that
> could use ImageMagick, so I went looking around for PythonMagick, and
> I'm a bit lost.
>
> I was able to download the PythonMagick source from the ImageMagick
> site, but I'm on Windows and don't have t
Does anyone know anything about PythonMagick? I've got a project that
could use ImageMagick, so I went looking around for PythonMagick, and
I'm a bit lost.
I was able to download the PythonMagick source from the ImageMagick
site, but I'm on Windows and don't have the ability to compile it. I
found
12 matches
Mail list logo
