Re: Q: "...Learning with Python" ...a property that addition and multiplication have...

2005-05-26 Thread Paul Rubin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > question is, "Can you think of a property that addition and > multiplication have that string concatenation and repetition do not?" > > I thought it was the commutative property but ""*3 is > equivalent to 3*"". Any ideas? Um, string concatenation is not commutative.

Re: Q: "...Learning with Python" ...a property that addition and multiplication have...

2005-05-25 Thread Dan Sommers
On 25 May 2005 17:23:45 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm reading "How to think like a computer scientist: Learning with > Python" and there's a question regarding string operations. The > question is, "Can you think of a property that addition and > multiplication have that string concatenati

Re: Q: "...Learning with Python" ...a property that addition and multiplication have...

2005-05-25 Thread Greg Ewing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "Can you think of a property that addition and > multiplication have that string concatenation and repetition do not?" Existence of inverses? E.g. the additive inverse of 3 is -3, but there are no "concatenative inverses" of strings. (BTW, I would consider this more ab

Re: Q: "...Learning with Python" ...a property that addition and multiplication have...

2005-05-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Greetings. > > I'm reading "How to think like a computer scientist: Learning with > Python" and there's a question regarding string operations. The > question is, "Can you think of a property that addition and > multiplication have that string concatenation and repetiti

Q: "...Learning with Python" ...a property that addition and multiplication have...

2005-05-25 Thread jeffbernstein
Greetings. I'm reading "How to think like a computer scientist: Learning with Python" and there's a question regarding string operations. The question is, "Can you think of a property that addition and multiplication have that string concatenation and repetition do not?" I thought it was the comm