Re: Question about 'remote objects'

2009-12-11 Thread Frank Millman
Frank Millman wrote: > > I am writing a multi-user business/accounting application. It is getting > rather complex and I am looking at how to, not exactly simplify it, but > find a way to manage the complexity. > [...] > > Is there any particular benefit in using remote objects as opposed to > w

Re: Question about 'remote objects'

2009-12-09 Thread Irmen de Jong
On 9-12-2009 13:56, Frank Millman wrote: My first thought was to look into Pyro. It seems quite nice. One concern I had was that it creates a separate thread for each object made available by the server. It doesn't. Pyro creates a thread for every active proxy connection. You can register thous

Re: Question about 'remote objects'

2009-12-09 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
> I am writing a multi-user business/accounting application. It is getting > rather complex and I am looking at how to, not exactly simplify it, but > find a way to manage the complexity. > > I have realised that it is logically made up of a number of services - > database service with connect

Re: Question about 'remote objects'

2009-12-09 Thread J Kenneth King
"Frank Millman" writes: > Hi all > > I am writing a multi-user business/accounting application. It is getting > rather complex and I am looking at how to, not exactly simplify it, but find > a way to manage the complexity. > > I have realised that it is logically made up of a number of services

Question about 'remote objects'

2009-12-09 Thread Frank Millman
Hi all I am writing a multi-user business/accounting application. It is getting rather complex and I am looking at how to, not exactly simplify it, but find a way to manage the complexity. I have realised that it is logically made up of a number of services - database service with connectio