On 2016-02-18 10:57, grsm...@atlanticbb.net wrote:
> Tim, the 'crazy-other-result format' is the
> result returned by the database, nothing
> I can do about that :)
then, much like converting byte-strings to unicode strings as early
as possible and converting them back to byte-strings as late as
p
ython-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Question on keyword arguments
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Dan Strohl wrote:
So, define a return object like:
from collections import UserList
class TestResponse(UserList):
def __str__(self):
return '\0xfe%s' % '\0xfe'.join(self.da
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Dan Strohl wrote:
> So, define a return object like:
>
> from collections import UserList
> class TestResponse(UserList):
> def __str__(self):
> return '\0xfe%s' % '\0xfe'.join(self.data)
>
> ...and return that object.
Out of interest, why UserList rat
ably minor
performance tuning.)
Dan Strohl
> -Original Message-
> From: Python-list [mailto:python-list-bounces+d.strohl=f5@python.org] On
> Behalf Of Peter Otten
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:37 AM
> To: python-list@python.org
> Subject: Re: Question on keyword argum
On 2016-02-18 09:00, grsm...@atlanticbb.net wrote:
> Would this be the correct way to return
> a list as a default result.
>
> Also, would the list be the preferable result (to a python
> programmer) ?
>
> def test(command, return_type='LIST'):
> """ Go to database and return data"""
> if
grsm...@atlanticbb.net wrote:
> Would this be the correct way to return
> a list as a default result.
If it does what you want it to do it is "correct" as in "complies with
specification".
> Also, would the list be the preferable result (to a python programmer) ?
A list as a return value is O
Would this be the correct way to return
a list as a default result.
Also, would the list be the preferable result (to a python programmer) ?
def test(command, return_type='LIST'):
""" Go to database and return data"""
if return_type == 'LIST':
result = ['ONE', 'TWO', 'THREE']
