On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 10:49:32 +0100, Wolfgang Keller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The project aims to make it simple to build networked multimedia
>> systems (eg audio, video, interactive systems),
>
> Why limit the scope of application artificially?
>
> Axon/Kamaelia imho is perfectly applicabl
> The project aims to make it simple to build networked multimedia
> systems (eg audio, video, interactive systems),
Why limit the scope of application artificially?
Axon/Kamaelia imho is perfectly applicable to any kind of application
that does some kind of data processing.
Think workflow appl
Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Michael Sparks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> def updater(interval, message):
>> t = time.time():
>> while 1:
>> if time.time() - t > interval:
>> print message
>
>yield None # add this
Yes. (I can't beli
"Michael Sparks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> An alternative to this is this:
>
> def updater(interval, message):
> t = time.time():
> while 1:
> if time.time() - t > interval:
> print message
yield None # add this
>
> def long_r
Tim Golden wrote:
> I just wanted to say that I find the ideas behind Kamaelia
> interesting, and I only wish I had an application for it!
> Because I'm not especially into media-streaming, I'm more
> interested in it from the point of view of the generator-based
> architecture.
It's nice to know
phil hunt wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:57:34 +0100, Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
...
>>Which aside from other things means you can't build (say) a video
>>& SMIL playback system trivially, yet.
>
> Isn't SMIL something that's goinhg to go into web browsers? In which
> case, you'
phil hunt wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:57:34 +0100, Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>> Is the audience programmers or
>>> less technical people? A project that allows non-technical people
>>> to build complex network applications is an ambitious one, but not
...
>>It's a little ambit
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:57:34 +0100, Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is the audience programmers or
>> less technical people? A project that allows non-technical people
>> to build complex network applications is an ambitious one, but not
>> impossible (I'd find it very impressive and
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:57:34 +0100, Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've reordered the q's slightly to avoid repetition... Also by answering
>this question first, it may put the rest of the answer into context
>better.
>
>phil hunt wrote:
>
>> At what stage of completion is it?
>
>This
I've reordered the q's slightly to avoid repetition... Also by answering
this question first, it may put the rest of the answer into context
better.
phil hunt wrote:
> At what stage of completion is it?
This is something we deliberately try to reflect in the version number.
Yes, you can build n
On 03 Aug 2005 17:30:31 +0400, Sergei Organov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (phil hunt) writes:
>[...]
>> Unix pipelines act on ascii files;
>
>No, they don't.
Nitpicker.
I would have thought it was perfectly obvious, in context, what I
meant.
--
Email: zen19725 at zen dot co d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (phil hunt) writes:
[...]
> Unix pipelines act on ascii files;
No, they don't.
--
Sergei.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:53:29 +0100, Tim Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[Michael Sparks]
>| Phil Hunt wrote:
>|
>| > Kamaelia seems it might be an interesting project. However, I don't
>| > think the project is well served by this announcement -- which I
>| > find vague and hard to understand.
On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 11:05:16 +0100, Michael Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Phil Hunt wrote:
>
>> Kamaelia seems it might be an interesting project. However, I don't
>> think the project is well served by this announcement -- which I
>> find vague and hard to understand. Which is a shame, becau
[Michael Sparks]
| Phil Hunt wrote:
|
| > Kamaelia seems it might be an interesting project. However, I don't
| > think the project is well served by this announcement -- which I
| > find vague and hard to understand. Which is a shame, because it
| > means that other people probably don't underst
Phil Hunt wrote:
> Kamaelia seems it might be an interesting project. However, I don't
> think the project is well served by this announcement -- which I
> find vague and hard to understand. Which is a shame, because it
> means that other people probably don't understand it very well
> either, wh
Kamaelia seems it might be an interesting project. However, I don't
think the project is well served by this announcement -- which I
find vague and hard to understand. Which is a shame, because it
means that other people probably don't understand it very well
either, which means less people wil
17 matches
Mail list logo
