JAG CHAN wrote:
> Friends, I am trying to learn Python.
> It will be of great help to me if you let me know which one would be best
> editor for learning Python.
> Plese note that I would like to have multiplatform editor which will be
> useful for both LInux and Windows XP.
> Thanks.
My choice i
I recommend Scribes on Linux. It's simple, fast and powerful.
Website: http://scribes.sf.net/
Flash Demo: http://scribes.sf.net/snippets.htm
GIF Demo: http://www.minds.may.ie/~dez/images/blog/scribes.html
JAG CHAN wrote:
> Friends, I am trying to learn Python.
> It will be of great help to me if
some wxPy IDEs maybe better.
> Friends, I am trying to learn Python.
> It will be of great help to me if you let me know which one would be best
> editor for learning Python.
> Plese note that I would like to have multiplatform editor which will be
> useful for both LInux and Windows XP.
> Thank
Wow I like the sound of "Learning a highly portable,
industrial-strength program like Vim or emacs is something I highly
recommend". I use Aquamacs (it's emacs with Mac OS-X Interface) and
emacs on other platform. It works great for me.
Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2006-08-24, JAG CHAN <[EMAIL PROTEC
Neil Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Start with IDLE, which will likely be available everywhere you
> use Python. The full instructions for using IDLE take up about
> two pages of text, which means it's lightweight, and it comes
> preconfigured with good Python int
Title: Re: Best Editor
I like ActiveState's KOMODO
editor. It is multilanguage compiler editor. Its not free but it is inexpensive
for what it does, IMO. I believe they have a 30day free trial and a version for
both platforms you mentioned.
-Caolan.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on b
On 2006-08-24, JAG CHAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Friends, I am trying to learn Python. It will be of great help
> to me if you let me know which one would be best editor for
> learning Python. Plese note that I would like to have
> multiplatform editor which will be useful for both LInux and
>
I personally use Eclipse with PyDev. It is a cross-platform solution
because Eclipse is made with Java.
http://www.eclipse.org/
http://pydev.sourceforge.net/
Michiel
Op 24-aug-2006, om 13:29 heeft JAG CHAN het volgende geschreven:
> Friends, I am trying to learn Python.
> It will be of great
Mike Meyer wrote:
Gee, it's changed from eight to eighty. Probably because eight is a
small app by todays standards. Then again, it's not like 80 is large
these days.
Yeah, it's probably time to upgrade it to 800. :-)
--
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept,
University of Canterbury,
Christchur
Mike Meyer wrote:
>> Yup, that's why emacs stands for Eighty Megabytes And Constantly
>> Swapping. ;-)
>
> Gee, it's changed from eight to eighty. Probably because eight is a
> small app by todays standards. Then again, it's not like 80 is large
> these days.
my emacs starts in no time at all, a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) writes:
>>>
>>> Use vim. 80% of the power of emacs at 20% of the learning curve.
>>
>>Hmm. Can I read mail/news/web pages in vim? I can in emacs.
> Yup, that's why
Mike Meyer wrote:
> For quick edits (as either root or me) I use ex. I can't get past ed
> not having a prompt.
For a Linux gui editor, try NEdit. It's almost identical to the old PFE
editor for Windoze and it 'knows' Python.
LittleJohn
Madison, AL
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) writes:
>>
>> Use vim. 80% of the power of emacs at 20% of the learning curve.
>
>Hmm. Can I read mail/news/web pages in vim? I can in emacs.
Yup, that's why emacs stands for Eighty Megabytes And Cons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aahz) writes:
> Use vim. 80% of the power of emacs at 20% of the learning curve.
Hmm. Can I read mail/news/web pages in vim? I can in emacs.
Emacs is a computing environment. I read mail and news in it, so I
don't have to worry about learning some applications custom editor
(
Howdy,
I'm sold on out Leo, http://leo.sf.net, pure Python
amazingly easy to learn and powerful.
Based on outlining, it provides a powerful and
flexible way to manage content. Lots of built in
Python code awareness.
Extensible with plugins, a very active community
is making "I wish my editor cou
Nicolay A. Vasiliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
> What do you think all about ActiveState Komodo?
Is this specifically to me? I haven't tried it, but I'm tempted.
I've recently begun teaching my wife some Python in order to help
her write a useful GUI app, and that makes it look particu
Yes, we vi/vim users are apparently extraordinary. Is that such a sad
thing? ;-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Paul McGuire wrote:
SciTE (Scintilla Text Editor) is just right for me too. Low overhead,
great just as a Notepad alternative, but with good coding support too.
-- Paul
Yes, I use SciTE. Syntax marking and multiple buffers. Works with
Windows and Linux.
Boa-constructor (Scintilla based editor),
Dnia 5 Apr 2005 11:22:59 -0700, ChinStrap napisał(a):
> Opinions on what the best is?
Eclipse + plugins: pydev (http://pydev.sourceforge.net/updates/) and
subclipse(http://subclipse.tigris.org/update/). It is free, stable,
contains integrated (visual) debugger, code completion, refactoring, PyLin
Joey C. wrote:
> When I'm using Windows, I have found the Syn TextEditor
The Zeus for Windows programmer's supports Python:
http://www.zeusedit.com/lookmain.html
Some of the programming specific features include:
+ Code folding (supports python)
+ Integrated class browser
+ Project/wo
When I'm using Windows, I have found the Syn TextEditor
(http://syn.sourceforge.net) to be quite useful. It has basic syntax
highlighting, about enough for me and is quite compatible with FTP and
such. It supports Python pretty well. Its user interface is quite
easy yet pretty powerful. All in
I bought the Komodo personal edition, and at only $30, it is worth it
for the regular expression toolkit alone.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 11:22 am, ChinStrap wrote:
> I keep hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all.
Both emacs and vi suffer from the fact that they can not be used by ordinary
humans. Thus, I recommend using either to impress your friends.
James
--
http://mail.python.org
[John J. Lee]
> François Pinard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> > Overall, Vim is also cleaner than Emacs, and this pleases me.
> [...]
> Is this still true when comparing XEmacs vs. vim? (rather than
> GNU Emacs vs. vim) I've always used GNU Emacs, but I have got the
> impression that XEmac
> "jjl" == John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Other editors also do stuff Emacs won't do. Code completion is a
>> killer feature and emacs sucks at it (yes, w/ Cedet too).
jjl> I thought that too, but then I bound dabbrev-expand to F4,
jjl> and it seems even better than
> "caneff" == ChinStrap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
caneff> Anyone want to send me a configuration setup with Python
caneff> in mind, and decent colors?
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/ColorTheme
--
Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Ville Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Miki" == Miki Tebeka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Miki> Emacs (or VIm in my case) takes time to learn. However when
> Miki> you start to understand it and know you way around it'll do
> Miki> things no other editor will do for you.
"ChinStrap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When not using the interactive prompt, what are you using? I keep
> hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all. I keep
> trying to learn and understand why so many seem to like it because I
> can't understand customization even without go
François Pinard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Overall, Vim is also cleaner than Emacs, and this pleases me.
[...]
Is this still true when comparing XEmacs vs. vim? (rather than GNU
Emacs vs. vim) I've always used GNU Emacs, but I have got the
impression that XEmacs is (was?) cleaner in some
Well I would be more than willing to learn Emacs if it does all these
things you speak of, but really I can't get started because the default
scheme is so friggin ugly it isn't funny.
Anyone want to send me a configuration setup with Python in mind, and
decent colors?
--
http://mail.python.org/m
[Harry George]
> 5. When I do Extreme Programming, the other author(s) tend to be using
> emacs, vim, or nedit. [...]
Speaking of, when everybody uses Emacs, there is a way for Emacs for
allowing many users, each on a different networked machine, all on the
very same buffer, simultaneously. This
[Mike L.G.]
> Emacs may seem awkward at first, but the payoff was amazing for me.
Same here. A good editor may tremendously increase your productivity.
However, nowadays, good editors abound, to the point that people are
not so astonished by them. I've been around for many years, and a
good whi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 11:22 am, ChinStrap wrote:
I keep hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all.
Both emacs and vi suffer from the fact that they can not be used by ordinary
humans.
My my my... I'm sorry to learn I'm not an ordinary human :(
Thus,
> "Miki" == Miki Tebeka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Miki> Emacs (or VIm in my case) takes time to learn. However when
Miki> you start to understand it and know you way around it'll do
Miki> things no other editor will do for you.
Other editors also do stuff Emacs won't do. Code co
Hello!
What do you think all about ActiveState Komodo?
Michael George Lerner wrote:
Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Use vim. 80% of the power of emacs at 20% of the learning curve.
A system administrator said this to me about unix a long time ago,
but it applies equally well to emacs:
Emac
Hello ChinStrap,
> When not using the interactive prompt, what are you using? I keep
> hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all. I keep
> trying to learn and understand why so many seem to like it because I
> can't understand customization even without going through a hundred
>
"ChinStrap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Opinions on what the best is? Or reading I could get to maybe sway me
> to Emacs (which has the major advantage of being on everyone's system).
When I first started using emacs, progress
was slow, but through my persistence, I was
able to harness the powe
Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use vim. 80% of the power of emacs at 20% of the learning curve.
A system administrator said this to me about unix a long time ago,
but it applies equally well to emacs:
Emacs is a great place to live, but I'd hate to visit.
-michael, an (x)emacs user
--
htt
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 11:22 am, ChinStrap wrote:
> I keep hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all.
Both emacs and vi suffer from the fact that they can not be used by ordinary
humans. Thus, I recommend using either to impress your friends.
James
--
http://mail.python.org/
SciTE (Scintilla Text Editor) is just right for me too. Low overhead,
great just as a Notepad alternative, but with good coding support too.
-- Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[Aahz]
> Use vim. 80% of the power of emacs at 20% of the learning curve.
I used Emacs for a long while, and learned it a bit thoroughly. I
also learned Vim mor recently, and still have many things to study.
See http://pinard.progiciels-bpi.ca/opinions/editors.html for some
(incomplete) thought
ChinStrap wrote:
When not using the interactive prompt, what are you using? I keep
hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all. I keep
trying to learn and understand why so many seem to like it because I
can't understand customization even without going through a hundred
menus that
Hi All--
Aahz wrote:
>
> Use vim. 80% of the power of emacs at 20% of the learning curve.
>
I think Aahz has it dead on. Umpty-mumble years ago I spent six weeks
learning emacs lisp and customizing emacs until it did EXACTLY what I
wanted. It was a great user interface, logical, consistent,
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
ChinStrap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>When not using the interactive prompt, what are you using? I keep
>hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all. I keep
>trying to learn and understand why so many seem to like it because I
>can't understand cus
ChinStrap wrote:
Opinions on what the best is?
The best editor? Ed is the standard text editor. Accept no substitutes.
--
Michael Hoffman
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi All--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Windows: textpad
> Linux: vim
>
Windows: gvim
Linux: gvim, or vim if I have to.
Other unices: gvim, vim, vi
SlickEdit doesn't suck. Emacs doesn't suck, either.
Metta,
Ivan
--
Ivan Van Laningham
God N Locomotiv
Windows: textpad
Linux: vim
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ChinStrap wrote:
>> When not using the interactive prompt, what are you using? I keep
>> hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all. I keep
>> trying to learn and understand why so many seem to like it because I
>> can't understand customization even wit
ChinStrap wrote:
> When not using the interactive prompt, what are you using? I keep
> hearing everyone say Emacs, but I can't understand it at all. I keep
> trying to learn and understand why so many seem to like it because I
> can't understand customization even without going through a hundred
>
I use gedit under gnome, works perfect, it is very easy to use, it has
the colours - it also supports other languages.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
50 matches
Mail list logo
