Ok. Thanks!
bugs.python.org/issue18031
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 23:26:58 -0400
From: n...@nedbatchelder.com
To: carlosnepomuc...@outlook.com
CC: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Myth Busters: % this old style of formatting will eventually be
Is this tutorial outdated or this still an issue?
[1]
http://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/inputoutput.html#old-string-formatting
That tutorial is out of date. %-formatting isn't being removed.
OTOH, PEP 3101 also mentions deprecation, at the very end: ... both
systems can co-exist until it
On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:26:58 -0400, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 5/21/2013 10:26 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
Since str.format() is quite new, a lot of Python code still uses the %
operator. However, because this old style of formatting will eventually
be removed from the language, str.format()
On 5/22/2013 10:24 AM, Denis McMahon wrote:
Indeed, removing %-formatting could break a substantial amount of live
code, with potentially significant maintenance effort in the user
While I would like to see % formatting go away everntually*, other
developers would not. In any case, I agree
On May 22, 6:35 am, Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com wrote:
Is this tutorial outdated or this still an issue?
[1]
http://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/inputoutput.html#old-string-formatting
That tutorial is out of date. %-formatting isn't being removed.
OTOH, PEP 3101 also mentions
On 05/21/2013 07:26 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
I was looking for something else and just found what I think is the place where
I was first exposed to the myth[1]:
Since str.format() is quite new, a lot of Python code still uses the % operator.
However, because this old style of formatting
On 5/21/2013 10:26 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno wrote:
I was looking for something else and just found what I think is the place where
I was first exposed to the myth[1]:
Since str.format() is quite new, a lot of Python code still uses the % operator.
However, because this old style of formatting
