On 9/17/2023 5:01 AM, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
On Sep 15, 2023 19:45, "Peter J. Holzer via Python-list"
wrote:
On 2023-09-15 17:42:06 +0200, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
> This is more related to Postgresql than to Python, I hope this is
On 2023-09-17 11:01:43 +0200, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
>On Sep 15, 2023 19:45, "Peter J. Holzer via Python-list"
> wrote:
>
> On 2023-09-15 17:42:06 +0200, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
> > This is more related to Postgresql than to Python, I hope th
On 9/17/2023 11:48 AM, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
Timing things that are fairly simple is hard enough to do repeatedly, but when
it involves access to slower media and especially to network connections to
servers, the number of things that can change are enormous. There are all kinds
of
may have
trouble duplicating the results with a somewhat different setup.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2023 5:02 AM
To: Peter J. Holzer
Cc: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Postgresql equivalent of
On Sep 15, 2023 19:45, "Peter J. Holzer via Python-list"
wrote:
On 2023-09-15 17:42:06 +0200, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
> This is more related to Postgresql than to Python, I hope this is
ok.
> I want to measure Postgres queries N times, much like Py
On 2023-09-15 17:42:06 +0200, Albert-Jan Roskam via Python-list wrote:
>This is more related to Postgresql than to Python, I hope this is ok.
>I want to measure Postgres queries N times, much like Python timeit
>(https://docs.python.org/3/library/timeit.html). I know about EXPLAIN
>
