On Aug 13, 4:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> David C. Ullrich:
>
> > If you look at the end of the article you see the author
> > agrees (I don't quite follow his complaint about not feeling
> > at home with the interactive mode, but it's funny to read about
> > how he uses Lisp but realizes he's
David C. Ullrich:
> If you look at the end of the article you see the author
> agrees (I don't quite follow his complaint about not feeling
> at home with the interactive mode, but it's funny to read about
> how he uses Lisp but realizes he's not going to talk people
> into that...)
That well know
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Python as a language almost fit for Inquisitive computing:
Heh - language problem. At first I read "almost fit for" as
"almost satisfactory for". Looking at the link and your next
comment I think you meant "is almost a perfect fit for".
