Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-03-16 Thread astrobe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > rickman wrote: > > The original post seems to be missing, but my answer to the title > > question is, No, Forth is not real. > > Not for real, for Integer. No, it's for me and you (well, perhaps more for you than for me). But 4IM is forever mine :) Amicalement,

Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-24 Thread rickman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > rickman wrote: > > The original post seems to be missing, but my answer to the title > > question is, No, Forth is not real. > > Not for real, for Integer. :-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-20 Thread fox
rickman wrote: > The original post seems to be missing, but my answer to the title > question is, No, Forth is not real. Not for real, for Integer. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-20 Thread rickman
Cameron Laird wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . > . > . > >on the web for each language. By comparison, even Forth gives 13 million > >plus hits, and who uses Forth? >

Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread Elizabeth D Rather
"Cameron Laird" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . > . > . >>on the web for each language. By comparison, even Forth gives 13 million >>plus hits, and who uses Forth? > . > . > . > The prog

Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread Daniel Ciesinger
Steven D'Aprano schrieb: > On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:08:02 +, Cameron Laird wrote: > > >>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>on the web for each language. By comparison, even Forth gives 13 million >>>plus hits, and who uses Forth? 13m hits for fo

Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread skip
Roy> If you like Forth, take a look at PostScript. I miss NeWS... :-( Skip -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread Roy Smith
Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I love Forth. I'm no good at thinking at that low count-the-bytes level, > but if I was, I'd much prefer to use Forth than C or assembly. I've got a > bunch of Forth books here, and when I'm bored I read them for > entertainment, and dream. I love the f

Re: Is Forth for real?

2006-02-12 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 17:08:02 +, Cameron Laird wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . > . > . >>on the web for each language. By comparison, even Forth gives 13 million >>plus h