On 11/03/2015 21:59, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 7:51:17 PM UTC+1, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 08/03/2015 17:57, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 5:36:07 PM UTC+1, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 07/03/2015 15:55, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of cur
On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 7:51:17 PM UTC+1, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 08/03/2015 17:57, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 5:36:07 PM UTC+1, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> >> On 07/03/2015 15:55, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> Out of curiosity, is there any plan to use a mor
On 08/03/2015 17:57, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 5:36:07 PM UTC+1, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 07/03/2015 15:55, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity, is there any plan to use a more recent version of Visual
Studio (i.e.: 2013) to compile the official Python3
On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 5:36:07 PM UTC+1, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 15:55, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, is there any plan to use a more recent version of Visual
> > Studio (i.e.: 2013) to compile the official Python3 distribution for
> > Windows?
> > Is it in
On 07/03/2015 15:55, polyver...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity, is there any plan to use a more recent version of Visual
Studio (i.e.: 2013) to compile the official Python3 distribution for Windows?
Is it in discussion? Maybe waiting for the 2015 version?
I'm working on a C++ software that e
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 2:55 AM, wrote:
> Out of curiosity, is there any plan to use a more recent version of Visual
> Studio (i.e.: 2013) to compile the official Python3 distribution for Windows?
> Is it in discussion? Maybe waiting for the 2015 version?
>
> I'm working on a C++ software that em
