TG wrote:
> That's great, thanks !
>
> To put it short, when I create a Stimulus object, it first seek
> __new__() method. But if I don't define it, it looks for the one
> defined in Vector. This raises a problem because the parameters passed
> to Stimulus(params) aren't fitting with Vector parame
That's great, thanks !
To put it short, when I create a Stimulus object, it first seek
__new__() method. But if I don't define it, it looks for the one
defined in Vector. This raises a problem because the parameters passed
to Stimulus(params) aren't fitting with Vector parameters, raising an
excep
Sion Arrowsmith a écrit :
> Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>TG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>When I call Vector.__init__() in Stimulus, doesn't it also call __new__
>>>? I don't understand the detail of callings to __new__ and __init__ in
>>>python inheritance ...
>>
>>Calling a (n
Alex Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>TG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> When I call Vector.__init__() in Stimulus, doesn't it also call __new__
>> ? I don't understand the detail of callings to __new__ and __init__ in
>> python inheritance ...
>Calling a (new-style) class does __new__ first, THE
TG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> When I call Vector.__init__() in Stimulus, doesn't it also call __new__
> ? I don't understand the detail of callings to __new__ and __init__ in
> python inheritance ...
Calling a (new-style) class does __new__ first, THEN calls the class's
__init__ on the re
