On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:47:58 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
> The replacement would need to work with Py 3. TK does. I have not
> noticed that anything else does, though that should change eventually.
> (And I am sure someone will point of something I have not noticed.)
PyQt does.
Phil
--
http://ma
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...".
He is not in the business of designing GUI toolkits, but in the business
of designing programming languages. So he abstains from specifying
(or even
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...".
He is not in the business of designing GUI toolkits, but in the business
of designing programming languages. So he abstains from specifying
(or even
Casey Hawthorne wrote:
>>So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
>
> I saw a talk by a school teacher on pyFLTK: GUI programming made easy.
>
> On another note: I#: Groovy makes it easy to tie into the Java Swing
> GUI, so if Python could do that, with the added complication bein
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...".
He is not in the business of designing GUI toolkits, but in the business
of designing programming languages. So he abstains from specifying
(or even
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:17:22 -0700, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> His concern really isn't what is in the toolkit, but what isn't.
>> It must not require lots of lines of code to produce a simple
>> GUI, it must not require specification of absolute coordinates,
>> ... - you should be able to contin
On Jun 27, 12:54 pm, "laplacia...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> I just read a blog post of
> Guido'shttp://neopythonic.blogspot.com/2009/06/ironpython-in-action-and-decl...
> and notice that he doesn't comment on what he wants in a GUI toolkit
> for Python.
>
> I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "Th
On 27 Jun., 23:06, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> > I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
> > be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...".
>
> He is not in the business of designing GUI toolkits, but in the business
> of designing programming languages. So he abstain
> I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
> be suitable for a GUI toolkit for Python: ...".
He is not in the business of designing GUI toolkits, but in the business
of designing programming languages. So he abstains from specifying
(or even recommending) a GUI library
On Jun 27, 1:47 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> laplacia...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
>
> What he did say is "But it hasn't really gotten any less complex to
> create the simplest of simple UIs. And that's a shame. When is Microsoft
> going to learn th
laplacia...@gmail.com wrote:
I just read a blog post of Guido's
http://neopythonic.blogspot.com/2009/06/ironpython-in-action-and-decline-of.html
and notice that he doesn't comment on what he wants in a GUI toolkit
for Python.
I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
>So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
I saw a talk by a school teacher on pyFLTK: GUI programming made easy.
On another note: I#: Groovy makes it easy to tie into the Java Swing
GUI, so if Python could do that, with the added complication being the
user would need a JVM.
--
Re
12 matches
Mail list logo
