Timothy Smith wrote:
[...] is there anyway i can check
is it true psycopg is much faster or is it all hyperboll
The overhead of psycopg per cursor row is a lot less. So it makes a
difference if you fetch *a lot* of data.
Anyway, if you don't have a performance problem, you don't need to care ;-)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
>
>>Timothy Smith skrev:
>>
>>
>>
>>>has anyone got some hard numbers on which pg access module is the
>>>fastest, i currently use pypgsql, but i can't help but feel it's a
>>>little slow.
>>>3 se
my only issue with psycopg, is last time i looked they had no win32 port?
Not completely true. Since long time ago there is a website with
unofficial psycopg binaries:
http://www.stickpeople.com/projects/python/psycopg/
Regards,
Josef
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
With the round-trip time of 245ms, three seconds only allows for
approximately 12 packet exchanges (roughly 24 total packets). I think
latency is your problem.
casevh
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 09:31:45AM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote:
> Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
>
> >Timothy Smith skrev:
> >>has anyone got some hard numbers on which pg access module is the
> >>fastest, i currently use pypgsql, but i can't help but feel it's a
> >>little slow.
> >>3 seconds to connec
Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
Timothy Smith skrev:
my only issue with psycopg, is last time i looked they had no win32
port?
Uh, in that case, maybe you should consider changing platform? 8^)
my app has to be multiplatform, but i would gladly rip windows from the
drives of every computer wi
Timothy Smith skrev:
> my only issue with psycopg, is last time i looked they had no win32
> port?
Uh, in that case, maybe you should consider changing platform? 8^)
--
Leif Biberg Kristensen
just another global village idiot
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
Timothy Smith skrev:
has anyone got some hard numbers on which pg access module is the
fastest, i currently use pypgsql, but i can't help but feel it's a
little slow.
3 seconds to connect, send one query, get th return data.
i'm on a adsl 1.5mbit/256kbit link, the serve
Timothy Smith skrev:
> has anyone got some hard numbers on which pg access module is the
> fastest, i currently use pypgsql, but i can't help but feel it's a
> little slow.
> 3 seconds to connect, send one query, get th return data.
> i'm on a adsl 1.5mbit/256kbit link, the server is on a 10/10mbi
