2008/3/21, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been thinking of volunteering to port Tkinter to Python 3.0, I
hadn't noticed that there was any discussion of removing it. It would
be a shame IMHO.
I don't think Tkinter will be removed. It works just fine in 3k.
Of course, if you
Guilherme Polo wrote:
2008/3/21, Martin v. Löwis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been thinking of volunteering to port Tkinter to Python 3.0, I
hadn't noticed that there was any discussion of removing it. It would
be a shame IMHO.
I don't think Tkinter will be removed. It works just fine in
I've been thinking of volunteering to port Tkinter to Python 3.0, I
hadn't noticed that there was any discussion of removing it. It would
be a shame IMHO.
I don't think Tkinter will be removed. It works just fine in 3k.
Of course, if you would port IDLE to Tk 8.5: that would be a useful
Was looking at PEP 3108, http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ ,
and saw that the repr module was slated for vaporization. I've only
used the module a few times ever. I'm curious if the community wants
it kept around or whether it is considered clutter.
The PEP is going to be finalized
Daniel Fetchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is it just me or others also think that it would be a major loss to
remove tkinter from the python core?
That would be terrible. Every time I've tried to use one of the other
packages it has led to installation hell. Tkinter isn't great, but
it's
Is it just me or others also think that it would be a major loss to
remove tkinter from the python core? PEP 3108 starts off with:
Each module to be removed needs to have a justification as to why it
should no longer be distributed with Python.
From time to time someone makes a serious claim
Paul Rubin:
Python needs more stuff in its stdlib, not less.
If Tkinter doesn't satisfy, then add Gtk (or whatever) to the standard
distro. If that happens (i.e. some new toolkit is brought in and
declared to be the standard) then it might be ok to drop Tkinter but
it certainly shouldn't be
On 20 Mar, 08:39, Daniel Fetchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thoughts anyone?
I don't use tk myself, but scheduling tkinter for vaporization would
be a bad idea. A lot of programs depend on it, and it doesn't look
ugly anymore (the one that ship with Python still does).
Would inclusion of
On Mar 19, 11:39 pm, Daniel Fetchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Was looking at PEP 3108,http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/,
and saw that the repr module was slated for vaporization. I've only
used the module a few times ever. I'm curious if the community wants
it kept around or
On Mar 20, 2:39 am, Daniel Fetchinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it just me or others also think that it would be a major loss to
remove tkinter from the python core? PEP 3108 starts off with:
I really like Python since I started using it a couple years ago, but
this is a huge turnoff and the
On 21 Mar, 01:43, Simon Forman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been thinking of volunteering to port Tkinter to Python 3.0, I
hadn't noticed that there was any discussion of removing it.
That's because the forum for discussing these things wasn't mentioned
on comp.lang.python until two days ago.
11 matches
Mail list logo
