Andrey Fedorov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So from what I understand, Jython translates Python code into JVM byte
> code. Does anyone know why this was chosen instead of translating Python
> bytecode to JVM bytecode directly? It seems that it would be a lot
> easier to get Jython up-to-speed if there cou
Hi all,
So from what I understand, Jython translates Python code into JVM byte code.
Does anyone know why this was chosen instead of translating Python bytecode
to JVM bytecode directly? It seems that it would be a lot easier to get
Jython up-to-speed if there could be some "shared components" bet
