On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Devin Jeanpierre
wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> However, have you tried using a pipe for them instead of a real file? That
>> would allow you to retrieve the output without needing to pass through a
>> file in the file system. Y
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> However, have you tried using a pipe for them instead of a real file? That
> would allow you to retrieve the output without needing to pass through a
> file in the file system. You can also replace sys.stdout/err with arbitrary
> objects in
F L, 08.05.2012 21:07:
> We are trying to implement our own interactive interpreter in our
> applicationusing an embedded Python interpreter. I was wondering what
> would be the best way to retreive as text the result of executing
> Python code. The text must be exactly the same as it would be in
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:07 AM, F L wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We are trying to implement our own interactive interpreter in our
> application
> using an embedded Python interpreter.
>
> I was wondering what would be the best way to retreive as text the result of
> executing Python code. The tex
On May 8, 2012, at 3:07 PM, F L wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We are trying to implement our own interactive interpreter in our application
> using an embedded Python interpreter.
>
> I was wondering what would be the best way to retreive as text the result of
> executing Python code. The text
Hello everyone,
We are trying to implement our own interactive interpreter in our
applicationusing an embedded Python interpreter.
I was wondering what would be the best way to retreive as text the result of
executing Python code. The text must be exactly the same as it would be in
thestand
