Re: Running asyncio.run() more than once

2023-03-15 Thread Clint Olsen
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:32:23 PM UTC-7, Clint Olsen wrote: > We have an application that involves submitting hundreds to thousands of jobs > to a shared computing resource, and we're using asyncio to do so because it > is far less overhead than threading or multiprocessing for the bookkee

Re: Running asyncio.run() more than once

2023-03-14 Thread Clint Olsen
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:55:22 PM UTC-7, gst wrote: > Le mardi 14 mars 2023 à 02:32:23 UTC-4, Clint Olsen a écrit : > I'm not asyncio expert or even not advanced user, but using a simple list to > hold the jobs to execute and fill it as necessary after results gathering is > not good ? >

Running asyncio.run() more than once

2023-03-14 Thread Clint Olsen
We have an application that involves submitting hundreds to thousands of jobs to a shared computing resource, and we're using asyncio to do so because it is far less overhead than threading or multiprocessing for the bookkeeping required to keep track of all these jobs. It makes extensive use of

Re: Running asyncio.run() more than once

2023-03-14 Thread gst
Le mardi 14 mars 2023 à 02:32:23 UTC-4, Clint Olsen a écrit : > We have an application that involves submitting hundreds to thousands of jobs > to a shared computing resource, and we're using asyncio to do so because it > is far less overhead than threading or multiprocessing for the bookkeeping