kj7ny wrote:
> With some of my larger applications, it doesn't seem to work well to
> try to run the whole thing in the interpreter. At least for me, I am
> not a big IDE sort of programmer. I am much more comfortable in vim
> and command line stuff. I suppose I should use the IDE more.
you do
On Apr 4, 1:41 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kj7nywrote:
> > For years it has been a slight annoyance that every time I wanted to
> > test a snippet of code from a class by running it in the interactive
> > interpreter, I had to remove all of the self. instances from the
> > code.
kj7ny wrote:
> For years it has been a slight annoyance that every time I wanted to
> test a snippet of code from a class by running it in the interactive
> interpreter, I had to remove all of the self. instances from the
> code. After I got it working correctly, I had to put all the self.'s
> ba
Hope this hasn't been posted hundreds of times. I have never seen it
before, but could have missed it.
For years it has been a slight annoyance that every time I wanted to
test a snippet of code from a class by running it in the interactive
interpreter, I had to remove all of the self. instances f
